Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of reverse transcription yield of RNA standards and forensic samples based on droplet digital PCR.

Authors :
Gao N
Huo Y
Yu D
Cheng F
Wang T
Zhang X
Zhang L
Hu W
Li J
Yuan P
Liu J
Wang Y
Yan J
Source :
Biochemical and biophysical research communications [Biochem Biophys Res Commun] 2024 Jun 04; Vol. 711, pp. 149909. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 06.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

RNA analysis has shown great value in forensic science, such as body fluids and tissue identification, postmortem interval estimation, biological age prediction, etc. Currently, most RNA follow-up experiments involve reverse transcription (RT) procedures. It has been shown that the RT step is variable and has a greater impact on subsequent data analysis, especially for forensic trace samples. However, the pattern of variation between different RNA template inputs and complementary DNA (cDNA) yield is unclear. In this study, a series of 2-fold gradient dilutions of RNA standards (1 μg/μL - 0.24 ng/μL) and forensic samples (including blood samples, saliva samples, bloodstains, and saliva stains) were reverse-transcribed using EasyQuick RT MasterMix. The obtained cDNA was quantified by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to assess the RT yield of the ACTB gene. The results showed that the 125 ng RNA template had the highest RT yield in a 10 μL RT reaction system with the selected kit. For all stain samples, the RT yield improved as the amount of RNA template input increased since RNA quantities were below 125 ng. As many commercialized reverse transcription kits using different kinds of enzymes are available for forensic RNA research, we recommend that systematic experiments should be performed in advance to determine the amount of RNA input at the optimum RT yield when using any kit for reverse transcription experiments.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1090-2104
Volume :
711
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Biochemical and biophysical research communications
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38615573
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.149909