Back to Search
Start Over
Non-contrast MRI and post-mastectomy silicone breast implant rupture: preventing false positive diagnoses.
- Source :
-
European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) [Eur J Cancer Prev] 2024 Nov 01; Vol. 33 (6), pp. 525-532. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 08. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Breast implants are not lifelong, with implant rupture being the third leading cause of revisional surgery in augmented women. Noncontrast MRI is a reliable tool to assess implant integrity; however, false positive and false negative diagnoses have been reported due to an incorrect interpretation of MRI signs. This study aims to investigate the incidence of these misleading results, comparing MRI findings with intraoperative surgical observations and exploring signs of nonunivocal interpretation.<br />Materials and Methods: Between March 2019 and October 2022, our hospital, a referral center for breast cancer care, conducted 139 breast MRI examinations to evaluate implant integrity. Surgical intervention was deemed necessary for patients diagnosed with suspected or confirmed implant rupture at MRI. Those patients who did not undergo any surgical procedure (63 cases) or had surgery at different institutes (11 cases) were excluded.<br />Results: Among the 65 patients who underwent preoperative MRI and subsequent surgery at our institute, surgical findings confirmed the preoperative MRI diagnosis in 48 women. Notably, 17 women exhibited a discordance between MRI and surgical findings: three false negatives, 11 false positives and three possible ruptures not confirmed. Signs of nonunivocal or misleading interpretation were assessed on a patient-by-patient basis. The importance of obtaining detailed information about a patient's breast implant, including fill materials, number of lumens, manufacturer and shape, proved immensely beneficial for interpreting MRI signs accurately.<br />Conclusion: Pre-MRI knowledge of implant details and a meticulous evaluation of non-univocal signs can aid radiologists in accurately assessing implant integrity, reducing the risk of unnecessary revisional surgeries, and potentially averting allegations of medical malpractice.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Female
Middle Aged
False Positive Reactions
Adult
Breast Implantation adverse effects
Aged
Silicone Gels
Reoperation statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Postoperative Complications diagnosis
Postoperative Complications prevention & control
Postoperative Complications etiology
Postoperative Complications diagnostic imaging
False Negative Reactions
Breast Implants adverse effects
Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods
Breast Neoplasms surgery
Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Mastectomy adverse effects
Prosthesis Failure
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1473-5709
- Volume :
- 33
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38595140
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000887