Back to Search Start Over

An international multicenter cohort study on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for the treatment of symptomatic children with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.

Authors :
Lamba A
Roston TM
Peltenburg PJ
Kallas D
Franciosi S
Lieve KVV
Kannankeril PJ
Horie M
Ohno S
Brugada R
Aiba T
Fischbach P
Knight L
Till J
Kwok SY
Probst V
Backhoff D
LaPage MJ
Batra AS
Drago F
Haugaa K
Krahn AD
Robyns T
Swan H
Tavacova T
van der Werf C
Atallah J
Borggrefe M
Rudic B
Sarquella-Brugada G
Chorin E
Hill A
Kammeraad J
Kamp A
Law I
Perry J
Roberts JD
Tisma-Dupanovic S
Semsarian C
Skinner JR
Tfelt-Hansen J
Denjoy I
Leenhardt A
Schwartz PJ
Ackerman MJ
Blom NA
Wilde AAM
Sanatani S
Source :
Heart rhythm [Heart Rhythm] 2024 Oct; Vol. 21 (10), pp. 1767-1776. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 07.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) may cause sudden cardiac death (SCD) despite medical therapy. Therefore, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are commonly advised. However, there is limited data on the outcomes of ICD use in children.<br />Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of arrhythmic events in pediatric patients with CPVT with and without an ICD.<br />Methods: We compared the risk of SCD in patients with RYR2 (ryanodine receptor 2) variants and phenotype-positive symptomatic CPVT patients with and without an ICD who were younger than 19 years and had no history of sudden cardiac arrest at phenotype diagnosis. The primary outcome was SCD; secondary outcomes were composite end points of SCD, sudden cardiac arrest, or appropriate ICD shocks with or without arrhythmic syncope.<br />Results: The study included 235 patients, 73 with an ICD (31.1%) and 162 without an ICD (68.9%). Over a median follow-up of 8.0 years (interquartile range 4.3-13.4 years), SCD occurred in 7 patients (3.0%), of whom 4 (57.1%) were noncompliant with medications and none had an ICD. Patients with ICD had a higher risk of both secondary composite outcomes (without syncope: hazard ratio 5.85; 95% confidence interval 3.40-10.09; P < .0001; with syncope: hazard ratio 2.55; 95% confidence interval 1.50-4.34; P = .0005). Thirty-one patients with ICD (42.5%) experienced appropriate shocks, 18 (24.7%) inappropriate shocks, and 21 (28.8%) device-related complications.<br />Conclusion: SCD events occurred only in patients without an ICD and mostly in those not on optimal medical therapy. Patients with an ICD had a high risk of appropriate and inappropriate shocks, which may be reduced with appropriate device programming. Severe ICD complications were common, and risks vs benefits of ICDs need to be considered.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures All authors have no conflicts to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1556-3871
Volume :
21
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Heart rhythm
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38588993
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.006