Back to Search
Start Over
Robotic beyond total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancers: Perioperative and oncological outcomes from a multicentre case series.
- Source :
-
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology [Eur J Surg Oncol] 2024 Jun; Vol. 50 (6), pp. 108308. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 02. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Around 20% of rectal tumors are locally advanced with invasion into adjacent structures at presentation. These may require surgical resections beyond boundaries of total mesorectal excision (bTME) for radicality. Robotic bTME is under investigation. This study reports perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic bTME for locally advanced rectal cancers.<br />Materials and Methods: A multicentre, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected robotic bTME resections (July 2015-November 2020). Demographics, clinicopathological features, short-term outcomes, recurrences, and survival were investigated.<br />Results: One-hundred-sixty-eight patients (eight centres) were included. Median age and BMI were 60.0 (50.0-68.7) years and 24.0 (24.4-27.7) kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> . Female sex was prevalent (n = 95, 56.8%). Fifty patients (29.6%) were ASA III-IV. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was given to 125 (74.4%) patients. Median operative time was 314.0 (260.0-450.0) minutes. Median estimated blood loss was 150.0 (27.5-500.0) ml. Conversion to laparotomy was seen in 4.8%. Postoperative complications occurred in 77 (45.8%) patients; 27.3% and 3.9% were Clavien-Dindo III and IV, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 1.2% (n = 2). R0 rate was 92.9%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was offered to 72 (42.9%) patients. Median follow-up was 34.0 (10.0-65.7) months. Distant and local recurrences were seen in 35 (20.8%) and 15 patients (8.9%), respectively. Overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, and 5-years was 91.7, 82.1, and 76.8%. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 1, 3, and 5-years was 84.0, 74.5, and 69.2%.<br />Conclusion: Robotic bTME is technically safe with relatively low conversion rate, good OS, and acceptable DFS in the hands of experienced surgeons in high volume centres. In selected cases robotic approach allows for high R0 rates during bTME.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Jim S Khan, Philippe Rouanet, and Peter Coyne performs proctoring for Intuitive Surgical. Jim S Khan perform educational activity with Johnson & Johnson. Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Avanish Saklani, Volkan Ozben, Paul Neary, Seon Hahn Kim and Julio Garcia-Aguilar have no conflict to disclose.<br /> (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Female
Middle Aged
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local epidemiology
Blood Loss, Surgical statistics & numerical data
Survival Rate
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
Conversion to Open Surgery statistics & numerical data
Disease-Free Survival
Postoperative Complications epidemiology
Proctectomy methods
Treatment Outcome
Rectal Neoplasms surgery
Rectal Neoplasms pathology
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Operative Time
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-2157
- Volume :
- 50
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38583214
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108308