Back to Search Start Over

Characterization of parotid gland tumors using diffusion-relaxation correlation spectrum imaging: a preliminary study.

Authors :
Chen W
Geng D
Xu XQ
Hu WT
Dai YM
Wu FY
Zhu LN
Source :
Clinical radiology [Clin Radiol] 2024 Jun; Vol. 79 (6), pp. e878-e884. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 19.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Aim: To assess the performance of diffusion-relaxation correlation spectrum imaging (DR-CSI) in the characterization of parotid gland tumors.<br />Materials and Methods: Twenty-five pleomorphic adenomas (PA) patients, 9 Warthin's tumors (WT) patients and 7 malignant tumors (MT) patients were prospectively recruited. DR-CSI (7 b-values combined with 5 TEs, totally 35 diffusion-weighted images) was scanned for pre-treatment assessment. Diffusion (D)-T2 signal spectrum summating all voxels were built for each patient, characterized by D-axis with range 0∼5 × 10 <superscript>-3</superscript> mm <superscript>2</superscript> /s, and T2-axis with range 0∼300ms. With boundaries of 0.5 and 2.5 × 10 <superscript>-3</superscript> mm <superscript>2</superscript> /s for D, all spectra were divided into three compartments labeled A (low D), B (mediate D) and C (high D). Volume fractions acquired from each compartment (V <subscript>A</subscript> , V <subscript>B</subscript> , V <subscript>C</subscript> ) were compared among PA, WT and MT. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and area under the curve (AUC).<br />Results: Each subtype of parotid tumors had their specific D-T2 spectrum. PA showed significantly lower V <subscript>A</subscript> (8.85 ± 4.77% vs 20.68 ± 10.85%), higher V <subscript>B</subscript> (63.40 ± 8.18% vs 43.05 ± 7.16%), and lower V <subscript>C</subscript> (27.75 ± 8.51% vs 36.27 ± 11.09) than WT (all p<0.05). V <subscript>B</subscript> showed optimal diagnostic performance (AUC 0.969, sensitivity 92.00%, specificity 100.00%). MT showed significantly higher V <subscript>A</subscript> (21.23 ± 12.36%), lower V <subscript>B</subscript> (37.09 ± 6.43%), and higher V <subscript>C</subscript> (41.68 ± 13.72%) than PA (all p<0.05). Similarly, V <subscript>B</subscript> showed optimal diagnostic performance (AUC 0.994, sensitivity 96.00%, specificity 100.00%). No significant difference of V <subscript>A</subscript> , V <subscript>B</subscript> and V <subscript>C</subscript> was found between WT and MT.<br />Conclusions: DR-CSI might be a promising and non-invasive way for characterizing parotid gland tumors.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1365-229X
Volume :
79
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38582630
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.02.006