Back to Search
Start Over
Characterization of parotid gland tumors using diffusion-relaxation correlation spectrum imaging: a preliminary study.
- Source :
-
Clinical radiology [Clin Radiol] 2024 Jun; Vol. 79 (6), pp. e878-e884. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 19. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Aim: To assess the performance of diffusion-relaxation correlation spectrum imaging (DR-CSI) in the characterization of parotid gland tumors.<br />Materials and Methods: Twenty-five pleomorphic adenomas (PA) patients, 9 Warthin's tumors (WT) patients and 7 malignant tumors (MT) patients were prospectively recruited. DR-CSI (7 b-values combined with 5 TEs, totally 35 diffusion-weighted images) was scanned for pre-treatment assessment. Diffusion (D)-T2 signal spectrum summating all voxels were built for each patient, characterized by D-axis with range 0∼5 × 10 <superscript>-3</superscript> mm <superscript>2</superscript> /s, and T2-axis with range 0∼300ms. With boundaries of 0.5 and 2.5 × 10 <superscript>-3</superscript> mm <superscript>2</superscript> /s for D, all spectra were divided into three compartments labeled A (low D), B (mediate D) and C (high D). Volume fractions acquired from each compartment (V <subscript>A</subscript> , V <subscript>B</subscript> , V <subscript>C</subscript> ) were compared among PA, WT and MT. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and area under the curve (AUC).<br />Results: Each subtype of parotid tumors had their specific D-T2 spectrum. PA showed significantly lower V <subscript>A</subscript> (8.85 ± 4.77% vs 20.68 ± 10.85%), higher V <subscript>B</subscript> (63.40 ± 8.18% vs 43.05 ± 7.16%), and lower V <subscript>C</subscript> (27.75 ± 8.51% vs 36.27 ± 11.09) than WT (all p<0.05). V <subscript>B</subscript> showed optimal diagnostic performance (AUC 0.969, sensitivity 92.00%, specificity 100.00%). MT showed significantly higher V <subscript>A</subscript> (21.23 ± 12.36%), lower V <subscript>B</subscript> (37.09 ± 6.43%), and higher V <subscript>C</subscript> (41.68 ± 13.72%) than PA (all p<0.05). Similarly, V <subscript>B</subscript> showed optimal diagnostic performance (AUC 0.994, sensitivity 96.00%, specificity 100.00%). No significant difference of V <subscript>A</subscript> , V <subscript>B</subscript> and V <subscript>C</subscript> was found between WT and MT.<br />Conclusions: DR-CSI might be a promising and non-invasive way for characterizing parotid gland tumors.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Female
Middle Aged
Adult
Aged
Prospective Studies
Parotid Gland diagnostic imaging
Parotid Gland pathology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Aged, 80 and over
Parotid Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Parotid Neoplasms pathology
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods
Adenoma, Pleomorphic diagnostic imaging
Adenoma, Pleomorphic pathology
Adenolymphoma diagnostic imaging
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1365-229X
- Volume :
- 79
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical radiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38582630
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.02.006