Back to Search Start Over

Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study on Safety and Electroencephalographic Response to Lacosamide for Neonatal Seizures.

Authors :
Kaur M
Utidjian L
Abend NS
Dickinson K
Roebling R
McDonald J
Maltenfort MG
Foskett N
Elmoufti S
Guerriero RM
Jain BG
Pajor NM
Rao S
Shellhaas RA
Slaughter L
Forrest CB
Source :
Pediatric neurology [Pediatr Neurol] 2024 Jun; Vol. 155, pp. 18-25. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 13.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of lacosamide in older children. However, minimal data are available for neonates. We aimed to determine the incidence of adverse events associated with lacosamide use and explore the electroencephalographic seizure response to lacosamide in neonates.<br />Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from seven pediatric hospitals from January 2009 to February 2020. For safety outcomes, neonates were followed for ≤30 days from index date. Electroencephalographic response of lacosamide was evaluated based on electroencephalographic reports for ≤3 days.<br />Results: Among 47 neonates, 98% received the first lacosamide dose in the intensive care units. During the median follow-up of 12 days, 19% of neonates died, and the crude incidence rate per 1000 patient-days (95% confidence interval) of the adverse events by diagnostic categories ranged from 2.8 (0.3, 10.2) for blood or lymphatic system disorders and nervous system disorders to 10.5 (4.2, 21.6) for cardiac disorders. Electroencephalographic seizures were observed in 31 of 34 patients with available electroencephalographic data on the index date. There was seizure improvement in 29% of neonates on day 1 and also in 29% of neonates on day 2. On day 3, there was no change in 50% of neonates and unknown change in 50% of neonates.<br />Conclusions: The results are reassuring regarding the safety of lacosamide in neonates. Although some neonates had fewer seizures after lacosamide administration, the lack of a comparator arm and reliance on qualitative statements in electroencephalographic reports limit the preliminary efficacy results.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: R.R. and S.E. are employees of UCB Pharma. M.K. is an employee of Barrington James Ltd on behalf of UCB Pharma and a PhD student at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. N.F. is a former employee of UCB Pharma and current employee of Ferring SAS. RAS was an employee of University of Michigan at the time of study.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-5150
Volume :
155
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Pediatric neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38579433
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.03.007