Back to Search Start Over

Size-selective sampler combined with an immunochromatographic assay for the rapid detection of airborne Legionella pneumophila.

Authors :
Liao L
Luo ZQ
Byeon JH
Park JH
Source :
The Science of the total environment [Sci Total Environ] 2024 Jun 01; Vol. 927, pp. 172085. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 29.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Airborne biological aerosols (also called bioaerosols) are found in various environmental and occupational settings. Among these, pathogenic bioaerosols can cause diseases such as legionellosis, influenza, measles, and tuberculosis. To prevent or minimize people's exposure to these pathogenic bioaerosols in the field, a rapid detection method is required. In this study, a size-selective bioaerosol (SSB) sampler was combined with the immunochromatographic assay (ICA). The SSB sampler can collect bioaerosols on the sampling swab and the lateral flow test kit used in ICA can rapidly detect the pathogens in bioaerosols collected on the swab. Before testing the combined method, the lower limit of detection (LOD) of the lateral flow test kit was determined. Legionella pneumophila (L. pneumophila) was used as a target pathogen. The results show that at least 1.3 × 10 <superscript>3</superscript> L. pneumophila cells are required to be detected by the lateral flow test kit. To test the developed method, L. pneumophila suspension was aerosolized in the sampling chamber and collected using two SSB samplers with different sampling times (10 and 20 min). The developed method could detect aerosolized L. pneumophila and also estimate the concentrations from the lower LOD, sampling time, and formation of a positive line on a test strip. When positive results were obtained from sampling for 10 min and 20 min, concentrations of respirable L. pneumophila were estimated ≥5.2 × 10 <superscript>4</superscript> CFU <subscript>resp</subscript> /m <superscript>3</superscript> and ≥2.6 × 10 <superscript>4</superscript> CFU <subscript>resp</subscript> /m <superscript>3</superscript> , respectively. The conventional sampler Andersen impactor with colony counting was also used for comparison. In all cases, the estimated concentrations obtained by the developed method were higher than those obtained by the conventional method. These findings confirm that the developed method can overcome the limitations of conventional methods and eventually benefit environmental and occupational health by providing a better method for risk assessment.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jae Hong Park reports financial support was provided by National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Li Liao reports financial support was provided by National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-1026
Volume :
927
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Science of the total environment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38554967
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172085