Top 5 barriers in cardiac arrest research as perceived by international early career researchers - A consensus study.

Aim of the Study: Cardiac arrest research has not received as much scientific attention as research on other topics. Here, we aimed to identify cardiac arrest research barriers from the perspective of an international group of early career researchers.
Methods: Attendees of the 2022 international masterclass on cardiac arrest registry research accompanied the Global Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry collaborative meeting in Utstein, Norway, and used an adapted hybrid nominal group technique to obtain a diverse and comprehensive perspective. Barriers were identified using a web-based questionnaire and discussed and ranked during an in-person follow-up meeting. After each response was discussed and clarified, barriers were categorized and ranked over two rounds. Each participant scored these from 1 (least significant) to 5 (most significant).
Results: Nine participants generated 36 responses, forming seven overall categories of cardiac arrest research barriers. "Allocated research time" was ranked first in both rounds. "Scientific environment", including appropriate mentorship and support systems, ranked second in the final ranking. "Resources", including funding and infrastructure, ranked third. "Access to and availability of cardiac arrest research data" was the fourth-ranked barrier. This included data from the cardiac arrest registries, medical devices, and clinical studies. Finally, "uniqueness" was the fifth-ranked barrier. This included ethical issues, patient recruitment challenges, and unique characteristics of cardiac arrest.
Conclusion: By identifying cardiac arrest research barriers and suggesting solutions, this study may act as a tool for stakeholders to focus on helping early career researchers overcome these barriers, thus paving the road for future research.
Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. AE, KT, and VK are committee members/representatives of the Young European Resuscitation Council. BM: Member of the European Resuscitation Council and German Resuscitation Council. CM: Member of the European Resuscitation Council and German Resuscitation Council. SO: Member of the European Resuscitation Council and Austrian Resuscitation Council. All other authors state no conflict of interest.
(© 2024 The Author(s).)