Back to Search Start Over

Single anastomosis duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m 2 : a multi-centered comparative analysis.

Authors :
Hage K
Teixeira AF
Surve A
Lind R
Jawad MA
Ghanem M
Abi Mosleh K
Kendrick ML
Cottam D
Ghanem OM
Source :
Surgical endoscopy [Surg Endosc] 2024 May; Vol. 38 (5), pp. 2657-2665. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 20.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has consistently demonstrated excellent weight loss and comorbidity resolution. However, outcomes vary based on patient's BMI. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve (SADI-S) is a novel procedure with promising short-term results. The long-term outcomes of SADI-S in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> are not well described. We aim to compare the safety and efficacy of SADI-S with RYGB in this patient population.<br />Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study of patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> who underwent RYGB or SADI-S between 2008 and 2023. Patient demographics, peri- and post-operative characteristics were collected. Complication rates were reported at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months postoperatively. A multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate and compare weight loss outcomes between both procedures.<br />Results: A total of 968 patients (343 RYGB and 625 SADI-S; 68.3% female, age 42.9 ± 12.1 years; BMI 57.3 ± 6.7 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> ) with a mean follow-up of 3.6 ± 3.6 years were included. Patients who underwent RYGB were older, more likely to be female, and have a higher rate of sleep apnea (p < 0.001), hypertension (p = 0.015), dyslipidemia (p < 0.001), and type 2 diabetes (p = 0.016) at baseline. The rate of bariatric surgery-specific complications was lower after SADI-S compared to RYGB. We reported no bariatric surgery related deaths after 1 year following both procedures. SADI-S demonstrated statistically higher and sustained weight loss at each time interval compared to RYGB (p < 0.001) even after controlling for multiple confounders. Lastly, the rate of surgical non-responders was lower in the SADI-S cohort.<br />Conclusions: In our cohort, SADI-S was associated with higher and sustained weight-loss results compared to RYGB. Comorbidity resolution was also higher after SADI-S. Both procedures demonstrate a similar safety profile. Further studies are required to validate the long-term safety of SADI-S compared to other bariatric procedures.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-2218
Volume :
38
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Surgical endoscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38509391
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10765-3