Back to Search Start Over

Ursodeoxycholic acid does not reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection in newly allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: a prospective NICHE cohort.

Authors :
Gao H
Wang J
Zheng X
Pei X
Zheng Y
Zhai W
Zhang R
Chen X
Ma Q
Wei J
Yang D
Pang A
He Y
Feng S
Cao Y
Jiang E
Source :
Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology [Front Cell Infect Microbiol] 2024 Mar 05; Vol. 14, pp. 1324019. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 05 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: Retrospective studies have suggested that Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA) provide a protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in patients with liver disease. However, it is uncertain whether this finding can be extended to the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) cohort. Therefore, we aim to examine the protective potential of UDCA against SARS-CoV-2 infection in recently received allo-HSCT patients.<br />Methods: During the initial Omicron variant wave in China (December 2022 to February 2023), we conducted a prospective observational study involving 91 hospitalized patients who had undergone allo-HSCT within the previous 6 months as part of the National Longitudinal Cohort of Hematological Diseases (NICHE). Throughout hospitalization, we continuously monitored the status of COVID-19 using SARS-CoV-2 PCR kits or SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Tests.<br />Results: Among these patients, 67.0% (n = 61) were confirmed to have contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection. For the 52 patients evaluated, 23.1% experienced a severe or critical clinical course. There was no difference in the infection rate or severity of COVID-19 between the UDCA group and the non-UDCA group. We found that only patients transplanted between 3 and 6 months ago demonstrated a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those who received allo-HSCT within 3 months (Odds Ratio [OR]: 3.241, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.287-8.814, P = 0.016). But other clinical factors, such as administration of UDCA, showed no difference. Notably, only age ≥38 years old remained as an independent risk factor for a severe clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR: 3.664, 95% CI: 1.129-13.007, P = 0.035).<br />Conclusion: The effectiveness of UDCA in protecting newly allo-HSCT recipients against SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unconfirmed. Presently, the most effective strategy appears to be minimizing exposure to SARS-CoV-2.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04645199, identifier NCT04645199.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Gao, Wang, Zheng, Pei, Zheng, Zhai, Zhang, Chen, Ma, Wei, Yang, Pang, He, Feng, Cao and Jiang.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2235-2988
Volume :
14
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38505288
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1324019