Back to Search Start Over

Advancing assessment of asthma control with a composite tool: The Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire.

Authors :
Chipps BE
Zeiger RS
Beuther DA
Wise RA
McCann W
Reibman J
George M
Gilbert I
Eudicone JM
Coyne KS
Harding G
Murphy KR
Source :
Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology [Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol] 2024 Jul; Vol. 133 (1), pp. 49-56. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 16.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: National and international asthma guidelines and reports do not include control tools that combine impairment assessment with exacerbation history in one instrument.<br />Objective: To analyze the performance of the composite Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ) in assessing both domains of control and predicting exacerbation risk compared with the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 4-question symptom control tool (GINA SCT), Asthma Control Test (ACT), and physician expert opinion (EO) informed by GINA SCT responses and appraisal of GINA-identified risk factors for poor asthma outcomes.<br />Methods: Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated AIRQ and GINA SCT as predictors of ACT. McNemar's test compared the proportion of patients categorized at baseline as completely or well-controlled by each assessment but with current impairment or previous-year and subsequent-year exacerbations.<br />Results: The analysis included 1064 patients aged 12 years or older; mean (SD) age 43.8 years (19.3); 70% female; 79% White; and 6% Hispanic or Latino. AIRQ and GINA SCT were highly predictive of ACT well-controlled vs not well-controlled and very poorly controlled (receiver operator characteristic area under curve AIRQ = 0.90, GINA SCT = 0.86, P = .03 AIRQ vs GINA SCT) and ACT very poorly controlled vs well-controlled and not well-controlled asthma (receiver operator characteristic area under curve AIRQ = 0.91, GINA SCT = 0.87, P = .01 AIRQ vs GINA SCT). AIRQ rated fewer patients as having completely or well-controlled asthma who had current impairment (P < .01) or with previous-year and subsequent-year exacerbations (P < .001) than did GINA SCT, ACT, and EO.<br />Conclusion: AIRQ performs better in assessing both domains of current control and predicting exacerbation risk than do control tools and EO informed by GINA SCT and risk factors for poor asthma outcomes.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1534-4436
Volume :
133
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38494113
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2024.03.011