Back to Search Start Over

Mortality in patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with tenofovir or entecavir: A multinational study.

Authors :
Jang TY
Liang PC
Jun DW
Jung JH
Toyoda H
Wang CW
Yuen MF
Cheung KS
Yasuda S
Kim SE
Yoon EL
An J
Enomoto M
Kozuka R
Chuma M
Nozaki A
Ishikawa T
Watanabe T
Atsukawa M
Arai T
Hayama K
Ishigami M
Cho YK
Ogawa E
Kim HS
Shim JJ
Uojima H
Jeong SW
Ahn SB
Takaguchi K
Senoh T
Buti M
Vargas-Accarino I E
Abe H
Takahashi H
Inoue K
Yeh ML
Dai CY
Huang JF
Huang CF
Chuang WL
Nguyen MH
Yu ML
Source :
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology [J Gastroenterol Hepatol] 2024 Jun; Vol. 39 (6), pp. 1190-1197. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 13.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and Aim: The benefits of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in reducing the development of chronic hepatitis B (CHB)-related hepatocellular carcinoma remain controversial. Whether mortality rates differ between patients with CHB treated with ETV and those treated with TDF is unclear.<br />Methods: A total of 2542 patients with CHB treated with either ETV or TDF were recruited from a multinational cohort. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to balance the differences in baseline characteristics between the two patient groups. We aimed to compare the all-cause, liver-related, and non-liver-related mortality between patients receiving ETV and those receiving TDF.<br />Results: The annual incidence of all-cause mortality in the entire cohort was 1.0/100 person-years (follow-up, 15 757.5 person-years). Patients who received TDF were younger and had a higher body mass index, platelet count, hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid levels, and proportion of hepatitis B e-antigen seropositivity than those who received ETV. The factors associated with all-cause mortality were fibrosis-4 index > 6.5 (hazard ratio [HR]/confidence interval [CI]: 3.13/2.15-4.54, P < 0.001), age per year increase (HR/CI: 1.05/1.04-1.07, P < 0.001), alanine aminotransferase level per U/L increase (HR/CI: 0.997/0.996-0.999, P = 0.003), and γ-glutamyl transferase level per U/L increase (HR/CI: 1.002/1.001-1.003, P < 0.001). No significant difference in all-cause mortality was observed between the ETV and TDF groups (log-rank test, P = 0.69). After propensity score matching, no significant differences in all-cause, liver-related, or non-liver-related mortality were observed between the two groups.<br />Conclusions: Long-term outcomes of all-cause mortality and liver-related and non-liver-related mortality did not differ between patients treated with ETV and those receiving TDF.<br /> (© 2024 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1440-1746
Volume :
39
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38480009
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16537