Back to Search Start Over

Impact of mediterranean diet promotion on environmental sustainability: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors :
Álvarez-Álvarez L
Vitelli-Storelli F
Rubín-García M
García S
Bouzas C
Ruíz-Canela M
Corella D
Salas-Salvadó J
Fitó M
Martínez JA
Tojal-Sierra L
Wärnberg J
Vioque J
Romaguera D
López-Miranda J
Estruch R
Tinahones FJ
Santos-Lozano JM
Serra-Majem L
Bueno-Cavanillas A
García-Fernández C
Esteve-Luque V
Delgado-Rodríguez M
Torrego-Ellacuría M
Vidal J
Prieto L
Daimiel L
Casas R
García Arellano A
Shyam S
González JI
Castañer O
García-Rios A
Ortiz Díaz F
Fernández AC
Sánchez-Villegas A
Morey M
Cano-Ibañez N
Sorto-Sánchez C
Bernal-López MR
Bes-Rastrollo M
Nishi SK
Coltell O
Zomeño MD
Peña-Orihuela PJ
Aparicio DV
Zulet MA
Vázquez Z
Babio N
Pérez KA
Tur JA
Martín-Sánchez V
Source :
Public health [Public Health] 2024 May; Vol. 230, pp. 12-20. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 12.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: This article aims to estimate the differences in environmental impact (greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions, land use, energy used, acidification and potential eutrophication) after one year of promoting a Mediterranean diet (MD).<br />Methods: Baseline and 1-year follow-up data from 5800 participants in the PREDIMED-Plus study were used. Each participant's food intake was estimated using validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaires, and the adherence to MD using the Dietary Score. The influence of diet on environmental impact was assessed through the EAT-Lancet Commission tables. The influence of diet on environmental impact was assessed through the EAT-Lancet Commission tables. The association between MD adherence and its environmental impact was calculated using adjusted multivariate linear regression models.<br />Results: After one year of intervention, the kcal/day consumed was significantly reduced (-125,1 kcal/day), adherence to a MD pattern was improved (+0,9) and the environmental impact due to the diet was significantly reduced (GHG: -361 g/CO2-eq; Acidification:-11,5 g SO2-eq; Eutrophication:-4,7 g PO4-eq; Energy use:-842,7 kJ; and Land use:-2,2 m2). Higher adherence to MD (high vs. low) was significantly associated with lower environmental impact both at baseline and one year follow-up. Meat products had the greatest environmental impact in all the factors analysed, both at baseline and at one-year follow-up, in spite of the reduction observed in their consumption.<br />Conclusions: A program promoting a MD, after one year of intervention, significantly reduced the environmental impact in all the factors analysed. Meat products had the greatest environmental impact in all the dimensions analysed.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1476-5616
Volume :
230
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Public health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38479163
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2024.02.010