Back to Search Start Over

Value of next generation sequencing (NGS) testing in advanced cancer patients.

Authors :
Ortendahl JD
Cuyun Carter G
Thakkar SG
Bognar K
Hall DW
Abdou Y
Source :
Journal of medical economics [J Med Econ] 2024 Jan-Dec; Vol. 27 (1), pp. 519-530. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 02.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: The availability of targeted therapies for oncology patients is increasing. Available genomic tests to identify treatment-eligible patients include single gene tests and gene panel tests, including the whole-exome, whole-transcriptome OncoExTra test. We assessed the costs and clinical benefits of test choice.<br />Methods: A Microsoft Excel-based model was developed to evaluate test choice in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. Treatment pathways were based on NCCN guidelines and medical expert opinion. Inputs were derived from published literature. Annual economic results and lifetime clinical results with OncoExTra testing were projected per-tested-patient and compared with single gene testing and no testing. Separately, results were estimated for a US health plan without the OncoExTra test and with its use in 5% of patients.<br />Results: Compared with no genomic testing, OncoExTra test use increased costs by $4,915 per patient; however, 82%-92% of individuals across tumour types were identified as eligible for targeted therapy or a clinical trial. Compared with single gene testing, OncoExTra test use decreased costs by $9,966 per-patient-tested while increasing use of approved or investigational targeted therapies by 20%. When considering a hypothetical health plan with 1 million members, 858 patients were eligible for genomic testing. Using the OncoExTra test in 5% of those eligible, per-member per-month costs decreased by $0.003, ranging from cost-savings of $0.026 in NSCLC patients to a $0.009 increase in prostate cancer patients. Cost-savings were driven by reduced treatment costs with increased clinical trial enrolment and reduced direct and indirect medical costs associated with targeted treatments.<br />Limitations: Limitations include the required simplifications in modelling complex conditions that may not fully reflect evolving real-world testing and treatment patterns.<br />Conclusions: Compared to single-gene testing, results indicate that using next generation sequencing test such as OncoExTra identified more actionable alterations, leading to improved outcomes and reduced costs.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1941-837X
Volume :
27
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of medical economics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38466204
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2329009