Back to Search Start Over

Is tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal therapy with proactive therapeutic drug monitoring optimized for inflammatory bowel disease? Network meta-analysis.

Authors :
Zheng FY
Yang KS
Min WC
Li XZ
Xing Y
Wang S
Zhang YS
Zhao QC
Source :
World journal of gastrointestinal surgery [World J Gastrointest Surg] 2024 Feb 27; Vol. 16 (2), pp. 571-584.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) monoclonal antibody therapy [adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX)] with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which has been proposed for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, are still controversial.<br />Aim: To determine the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody therapy with proactive TDM in patients with IBD and to determine which subtype of IBD patients is most suitable for proactive TDM interventions.<br />Methods: As of July 2023, we searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to compare anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody therapy with proactive TDM with therapy with reactive TDM or empiric therapy. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were used to determine the IBD patient subtype that achieved clinical remission and to determine the need for surgery.<br />Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis yielded 13 studies after exclusion, and the baseline indicators were balanced. We found a significant increase in the number of patients who achieved clinical remission in the ADA [odds ratio (OR) = 1.416, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.196-1.676] and RCT (OR = 1.393, 95%CI: 1.182-1.641) subgroups and a significant decrease in the number of patients who needed surgery in the proactive vs reactive (OR = 0.237, 95%CI: 0.101-0.558) and IFX + ADA (OR = 0.137, 95%CI: 0.032-0.588) subgroups, and the overall risk of adverse events was reduced (OR = 0.579, 95%CI: 0.391-0.858) according to the pairwise meta-analysis. Moreover, the network meta-analysis results suggested that patients with IBD treated with ADA (OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.19-1.63) were more likely to undergo TDM, especially in comparison with patients with reactive TDM (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.07-1.77).<br />Conclusion: Proactive TDM is more suitable for IBD patients treated with ADA and has obvious advantages over reactive TDM. We recommend proactive TDM in IBD patients who are treated with ADA.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors deny any conflict of interest for this article.<br /> (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1948-9366
Volume :
16
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
World journal of gastrointestinal surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38463352
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.571