Generation of affinity maps for thiazolidinediones with human serum albumin using affinity microcolumns. I. Studies of effects by glycation on multisite drug binding.

Human serum albumin (HSA) is known to undergo modifications by glucose during diabetes. This process produces glycated HSA that can have altered binding to some drugs. In this study, high-performance affinity microcolumns and competition studies were used to see how glycation affects the binding by two thiazolidinedione-class drugs (i.e., pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) at specific regions of HSA. These regions included Sudlow sites I and II, the tamoxifen and digitoxin sites, and a drug-binding site located in subdomain IB. At Sudlow site II, the association equilibrium constants (or binding constants) for pioglitazone and rosiglitazone with normal HSA were 1.7 × 10 ⁵ M ^-1 and 2.0 × 10 ⁵ M ^-1 at pH 7.4 and 37 °C, with values that changed by up to 5.7-fold for glycated HSA. Sudlow site I of normal HSA had binding constants for pioglitazone and rosiglitazone of 3.4 × 10 ⁵ M ^-1 and 4.6 × 10 ⁵ M ^-1 , with these values changing by up to 1.5-fold for glycated HSA. Rosiglitazone was found to also bind a second region that had a positive allosteric effect on Sudlow site I for all the tested preparations of HSA (binding affinity, 1.1-3.2 × 10 ⁵ M ^-1 ; coupling constant for Sudlow site I, 1.20-1.34). Both drugs had a strong positive allosteric effect on the tamoxifen site of HSA (coupling constants, 13.7-19.9 for pioglitazone and 3.7-11.5 for rosiglitazone). Rosiglitazone also had weak interactions at a site in subdomain IB, with a binding constant of 1.4 × 10 ³ M ^-1 for normal HSA and a value that was altered by up to 6.8-fold with glycated HSA. Neither of the tested drugs had any significant binding at the digitoxin site. The results were used to produce affinity maps that described binding by these thiazolidinediones with HSA and the effects of glycation on these interactions during diabetes.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: David S Hage reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)