Back to Search
Start Over
Reasons for multiple biologic and targeted synthetic DMARD switching and characteristics of treatment refractory rheumatoid arthritis.
- Source :
-
Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism [Semin Arthritis Rheum] 2024 Jun; Vol. 66, pp. 152421. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 01. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Objective: Switching biologic and targeted synthetic DMARD (b/tsDMARD) medications occurs commonly in RA patients, however data are limited on the reasons for these changes. The objective of the study was to identify and categorize reasons for b/tsDMARD switching and investigate characteristics associated with treatment refractory RA.<br />Methods: In a multi-hospital RA electronic health record (EHR) cohort, we identified RA patients prescribed ≥1 b/tsDMARD between 2001 and 2017. Consistent with the EULAR "difficult to treat" (D2T) RA definition, we further identified patients who discontinued ≥2 b/tsDMARDs with different mechanisms of action. We performed manual chart review to determine reasons for medication discontinuation. We defined "treatment refractory" RA as not achieving low disease activity (<3 tender or swollen joints on <7.5 mg of daily prednisone equivalent) despite treatment with two different b/tsDMARD mechanisms of action. We compared demographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors between treatment refractory RA and b/tsDMARD initiators not meeting D2T criteria.<br />Results: We identified 6040 RA patients prescribed ≥1 b/tsDMARD including 404 meeting D2T criteria. The most common reasons for medication discontinuation were inadequate response (43.3 %), loss of efficacy (25.8 %), and non-allergic adverse events (13.7 %). Of patients with D2T RA, 15 % had treatment refractory RA. Treatment refractory RA patients were younger at b/tsDMARD initiation (mean 47.2 vs. 55.2 years, p < 0.001), more commonly female (91.8% vs. 76.1 %, p = 0.006), and ever smokers (68.9% vs. 49.9 %, p = 0.005). No RA clinical factors differentiated treatment refractory RA patients from b/tsDMARD initiators.<br />Conclusions: In a large EHR-based RA cohort, the most common reasons for b/tsDMARD switching were inadequate response, loss of efficacy, and nonallergic adverse events (e.g. infections, leukopenia, psoriasis). Clinical RA factors were insufficient for differentiating b/tsDMARD responders from nonresponders.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest MEW reports research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Aqtual, Abbvie, and Janssen; consultancy for Abbvie, Aclaris, Amgen, Aqtual, Bristol Myers Squibb, CorEvitas, Glaxo Smith Kline, Gilead, Horizon, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Pfizer, Rani, Revolo, Saniofi, Scipher, Sci Rhom, Set Point, and Tremeau; and stock or stock options from Canfite, Inmedix, Scipher. Other authors report no competing interests.<br /> (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-866X
- Volume :
- 66
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38457949
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152421