Back to Search Start Over

Anticoagulation with argatroban using hemoclot™ targets is safe and effective in CARDS patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An exploratory bi-centric cohort study.

Authors :
Mayerhöfer T
Joannidis M
Peer A
Perschinka F
Fries D
Mair P
Gasteiger L
Bachler M
Kilo J
Herkner H
Schwameis M
Schellongowski P
Nagler B
Kornfehl A
Staudinger T
Buchtele N
Source :
Thrombosis research [Thromb Res] 2024 Apr; Vol. 236, pp. 161-166. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 02.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Direct thrombin inhibitors, including argatroban, are increasingly used for anticoagulation during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). In many centers activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is used for monitoring, but it can be affected by several confounders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation with argatroban titrated according to diluted thrombin time targets (hemoclot™ assay) compared to anti-Xa guided anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH).<br />Methods: This cohort study included adults at two tertiary care centers who required VV ECMO for severe COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS). Patients received center-dependent argatroban or UFH for anticoagulation during ECMO. Argatroban was guided following a hemoclot™ target range of 0.4-0.6 μg/ml. UFH was guided by anti-factor Xa (antiXa) levels (0.2-0.3 IU/ml). The primary outcome was safety of argatroban compared to UFH, assessed by time to first clinically relevant bleeding event or death during ECMO. Secondary outcomes included efficacy (time to thromboembolism) and feasibility (proportion of anticoagulation targets within range).<br />Results: From 2019 to 2021 57 patients were included in the study with 27 patients (47 %) receiving argatroban and 30 patients (53 %) receiving UFH. The time to the first clinically relevant bleeding or death during ECMO was similar between groups (HR (argatroban vs. UFH): 1.012, 95 % CI 0.44-2.35, p = 0.978). Argatroban was associated with a decreased risk for thromboembolism compared to UFH (HR 0.494 (95 % CI 0.26-0.95; p = 0.034)). The overall proportion of anticoagulation within target ranges was not different between groups (46 % (23-54 %) vs. 46 % (37 %-57 %), p = 0.45).<br />Conclusion: Anticoagulation with argatroban according to hemoclot™ targets (0.4-0.6 μg/ml) compared to antiXa guided UFH (0.2-0.3 IU/ml) is safe and may prolong thromboembolism-free time in patients with severe ARDS requiring VV ECMO.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-2472
Volume :
236
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Thrombosis research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38452448
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2024.02.026