Back to Search Start Over

Associations between ultra-distal forearm bone mineral density and incident fracture in women.

Authors :
Holloway-Kew KL
Betson AG
Anderson KB
Kotowicz MA
Pasco JA
Source :
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA [Osteoporos Int] 2024 Jun; Vol. 35 (6), pp. 1019-1027. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 06.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Bone mineral density measured at the ultra-distal forearm site was associated with any fracture, as well as distal radius fracture in women from a longitudinal cohort study.<br />Purpose: Femoral neck (BMD <subscript>hip</subscript> ) and lumbar spine (BMD <subscript>spine</subscript> ) bone mineral density (BMD) are routinely used to assess fracture risk. More data are needed to understand how ultra-distal forearm BMD (BMD <subscript>UDforearm</subscript> ) may assist fracture prediction.<br />Methods: Using a Lunar DPX-L, Geelong Osteoporosis Study women (n = 1026), aged 40-90 years, had BMD measured. Incident low-trauma fractures were radiologically verified. Using Cox proportional hazard models, hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for BMD <subscript>UDforearm</subscript> as a continuous variable (expressed as a one-unit decrease in T-score) and a categorical variable (normal/osteopenia/osteoporosis). Areas under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curves were calculated. Analyses were conducted for any fracture and distal radius fractures.<br />Results: During 14,270 person-years of follow-up, there were 318 fractures (85 distal radius). In adjusted models, continuous BMD <subscript>UDforearm</subscript> was associated with any (HR 1.26;95%CI 1.15-1.39) and distal radius fractures (HR 1.59;95%CI 1.38-1.83). AUROCs for continuous BMD <subscript>UDforearm</subscript> , 33% forearm(BMD <subscript>33%forearm</subscript> ), BMD <subscript>hip</subscript> , BMD <subscript>spine</subscript> , and FRAX without BMD were similar for any fracture (p > 0.05). For distal radius fracture, the AUROC for BMD <subscript>UDforearm</subscript> was higher than other sites and FRAX (p < 0.05). In adjusted models, those with osteoporosis had a higher likelihood of any fracture (HR 2.12; 95%CI 1.50-2.98). For distal radius fractures, both osteopenia and osteoporosis had a higher risk (HR 4.31; 95%CI 2.59-7.15 and 4.81; 95%CI 2.70-8.58). AUROCs for any fracture were similar for categorical BMD at all sites but lower for FRAX (p < 0.05). For distal radius fractures, the AUROC for BMD <subscript>UDforearm</subscript> , was higher than other sites and FRAX (p < 0.05).<br />Conclusion: Ultra-distal forearm BMD may aid risk assessments for any distal radius fractures.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1433-2965
Volume :
35
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38448781
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07041-4