Back to Search
Start Over
Associations between ultra-distal forearm bone mineral density and incident fracture in women.
- Source :
-
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA [Osteoporos Int] 2024 Jun; Vol. 35 (6), pp. 1019-1027. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 06. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Bone mineral density measured at the ultra-distal forearm site was associated with any fracture, as well as distal radius fracture in women from a longitudinal cohort study.<br />Purpose: Femoral neck (BMD <subscript>hip</subscript> ) and lumbar spine (BMD <subscript>spine</subscript> ) bone mineral density (BMD) are routinely used to assess fracture risk. More data are needed to understand how ultra-distal forearm BMD (BMD <subscript>UDforearm</subscript> ) may assist fracture prediction.<br />Methods: Using a Lunar DPX-L, Geelong Osteoporosis Study women (n = 1026), aged 40-90 years, had BMD measured. Incident low-trauma fractures were radiologically verified. Using Cox proportional hazard models, hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for BMD <subscript>UDforearm</subscript> as a continuous variable (expressed as a one-unit decrease in T-score) and a categorical variable (normal/osteopenia/osteoporosis). Areas under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curves were calculated. Analyses were conducted for any fracture and distal radius fractures.<br />Results: During 14,270 person-years of follow-up, there were 318 fractures (85 distal radius). In adjusted models, continuous BMD <subscript>UDforearm</subscript> was associated with any (HR 1.26;95%CI 1.15-1.39) and distal radius fractures (HR 1.59;95%CI 1.38-1.83). AUROCs for continuous BMD <subscript>UDforearm</subscript> , 33% forearm(BMD <subscript>33%forearm</subscript> ), BMD <subscript>hip</subscript> , BMD <subscript>spine</subscript> , and FRAX without BMD were similar for any fracture (p > 0.05). For distal radius fracture, the AUROC for BMD <subscript>UDforearm</subscript> was higher than other sites and FRAX (p < 0.05). In adjusted models, those with osteoporosis had a higher likelihood of any fracture (HR 2.12; 95%CI 1.50-2.98). For distal radius fractures, both osteopenia and osteoporosis had a higher risk (HR 4.31; 95%CI 2.59-7.15 and 4.81; 95%CI 2.70-8.58). AUROCs for any fracture were similar for categorical BMD at all sites but lower for FRAX (p < 0.05). For distal radius fractures, the AUROC for BMD <subscript>UDforearm</subscript> , was higher than other sites and FRAX (p < 0.05).<br />Conclusion: Ultra-distal forearm BMD may aid risk assessments for any distal radius fractures.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Female
Aged
Middle Aged
Adult
Aged, 80 and over
Risk Assessment methods
Incidence
Femur Neck physiopathology
Longitudinal Studies
Bone Density physiology
Osteoporotic Fractures physiopathology
Osteoporotic Fractures epidemiology
Osteoporotic Fractures etiology
Radius Fractures epidemiology
Radius Fractures physiopathology
Radius Fractures etiology
Forearm physiopathology
Forearm physiology
Absorptiometry, Photon methods
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal physiopathology
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal complications
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal epidemiology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1433-2965
- Volume :
- 35
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38448781
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07041-4