Back to Search Start Over

Plastic pigtail vs lumen-apposing metal stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis (PROMETHEUS study): an open-label, multicenter randomized trial.

Authors :
Gornals JB
Velasquez-Rodriguez JG
Bas-Cutrina F
Garcia Garcia De Paredes A
Esteban JM
Teran A
Gonzalez-Huix F
Perez-Miranda M
Guarner-Argente C
Vila JJ
Garcia-Sumalla A
Foruny JR
Fisac-Vazquez J
Moris M
Miquel-Salas I
De-la-Serna Higuera C
Murzi-Pulgar M
Sanchez-Yague A
Salord S
Ruiz-Osuna S
Busquets J
Sanllorente-Melenchon M
Videla S
Moreno R
Tebe-Cordomi C
Hereu P
Vazquez-Sequeiros E
Source :
Surgical endoscopy [Surg Endosc] 2024 Apr; Vol. 38 (4), pp. 2148-2159. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 06.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have displaced double-pigtail plastic stents (DPS) as the standard treatment for walled-off necrosis (WON),β but evidence for exclusively using LAMS is limited. We aimed to assess whether the theoretical benefit of LAMS was superior to DPS.<br />Methods: This multicenter, open-label, randomized trial was carried out in 9 tertiary hospitals. Between June 2017, and Oct 2020, we screened 99 patients with symptomatic WON, of whom 64 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the DPS group (n = 31) or the LAMS group (n = 33). The primary outcome was short-term (4-weeks) clinical success determined by the reduction of collection. Secondary endpoints included long-term clinical success, hospitalization, procedure duration, recurrence, safety, and costs. Analyses were by intention-to-treat.<br />Clinicaltrials: gov, NCT03100578.<br />Results: A similar clinical success rate in the short term (RR, 1.41; 95% CI 0.88-2.25; p = 0.218) and in the long term (RR, 1.2; 95% CI 0.92-1.58; p = 0.291) was observed between both groups. Procedure duration was significantly shorter in the LAMS group (35 vs. 45-min, p = 0.003). The hospital admission after the index procedure (median difference, - 10 [95% CI - 17.5, - 1]; p = 0.077) and global hospitalization (median difference - 4 [95% CI - 33, 25.51]; p = 0.82) were similar between both groups. Reported stent-related adverse events were similar for the two groups (36 vs.45% in LAMS vs. DPS), except for de novo fever, which was significantly 26% lower in LAMS (RR, 0.26 [0.08-0.83], p = 0.015).<br />Conclusions: The clinical superiority of LAMS over DPS for WON therapy was not proved, with similar clinical success, hospital stay and similar safety profile between both groups, yet a significant reduction in procedure time was observed.<br />Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03100578.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-2218
Volume :
38
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Surgical endoscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38448625
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10699-w