Postoperative function of patients with rheumatoid arthritis after total knee arthroplasty in the last decade was comparable in the unadjusted cohort but inferior in the propensity score matched cohort with that of patients with osteoarthritis.

Background: The perioperative pain and function of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) approach those in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to evaluate whether the clinical outcomes, especially functions, of patients with RA reached those of OA, utilizing a background-matched cohort.
Methods: Patients who underwent TKA between 2013 and 2021 were enrolled. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative scores, specifically the Original Knee Society Score (OKSS) and New Knee Society Score (2011KSS), between RA and OA were compared. Clinical assessments were performed on unadjusted and propensity-score matched cohorts, ensuring age, sex, body mass index, and valgus deformity rate parity.
Results: In an unadjusted cohort involving 98 patients with RA and 560 patients with OA, patients with RA demonstrated inferior preoperative OKSS-Function Score (FS) but similar postoperative functional scores to OA patients. In the matched cohort of 83, patients with RA displayed lower preoperative OKSS- FS (median difference: 20, P < 0.001) and 2011KSS functional activities (difference: 9, P = 0.01) beyond minimum clinically important differences than patients with OA. Patients with RA improved more in OKSS-FS, yielding no postoperative difference compared with patients with OA. However, postoperative 2011KSS functional activities remained lower in patients with RA (difference: 9.5, P = 0.03), especially in advanced functions, than in those with OA.
Conclusion: Postoperative function showed no difference between patients with RA and OA in the unadjusted cohort; within the background-matched cohort, postoperative function, especially advanced function, was inferior in patients with RA to those with OA.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: ‘K.N. received research grants and/or honorarium for lectures from Kyocera, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, and Daiichi-Sankyo. H.I. and K.M. belong or belonged to the department that is financially supported by Nagahama City, Shiga, Japan, Toyooka City, Hyogo, Japan and five pharmaceutical companies (Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Chugai, UCB Japan, Ayumi and Asahi-Kasei Pharma). H.I. received a research grant from Bristol-Myers. S.N. received a research grant Kyocera. S.K. declares no conflicts of interest. S.M. received a research grant and honorarium for lectures from Kyocera. KURAMA cohort is supported by Daiichi-Sankyo. The sponsors had no role in the design or conduct of the study.’.
(Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)