Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas.

MLA

Khalafallah, Adham M., et al. “Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of 3D Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography versus Digital Subtraction Angiography in Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas.” Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 56, no. 3, Mar. 2024, p. E10. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.12.FOCUS23749.

APA

Khalafallah, A. M., Yunga Tigre, J., Rady, N., Starke, R. M., Saraf-Lavi, E., & Levi, A. D. (2024). Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurosurgical Focus, 56(3), E10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.12.FOCUS23749

Chicago

Khalafallah, Adham M, Joseph Yunga Tigre, Nadine Rady, Robert M Starke, Efrat Saraf-Lavi, and Allan D Levi. 2024. “Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of 3D Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography versus Digital Subtraction Angiography in Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas.” Neurosurgical Focus 56 (3): E10. doi:10.3171/2023.12.FOCUS23749.