Back to Search Start Over

Costs of distributing HIV self-testing kits in Eswatini through community and workplace models.

Authors :
McGee K
d'Elbée M
Dekova R
Sande LA
Dube L
Masuku S
Dlamini M
Mangenah C
Mwenge L
Johnson C
Hatzold K
Neuman M
Meyer-Rath G
Terris-Prestholt F
Source :
BMC infectious diseases [BMC Infect Dis] 2024 Feb 29; Vol. 22 (Suppl 1), pp. 976. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 29.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the implementation and running costs of an HIV self-testing (HIVST) distribution program in Eswatini. HIVST kits were delivered through community-based and workplace models using primary and secondary distribution. Primary clients could self-test onsite or offsite. This study presents total running economic costs of kit distribution per model between April 2019 and March 2020, and estimates average cost per HIVST kit distributed, per client self-tested, per client self-tested reactive, per client confirmed positive, and per client initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART).<br />Methods: Distribution data and follow-up phone interviews were analysed to estimate implementation outcomes. Results were presented for each step of the care cascade using best-case and worst-case scenarios. A top-down incremental cost-analysis was conducted from the provider perspective using project expenditures. Sensitivity and scenario analyses explored effects of economic and epidemiological parameters on average costs.<br />Results: Nineteen thousand one hundred fifty-five HIVST kits were distributed to 13,031 individuals over a 12-month period, averaging 1.5 kits per recipient. 83% and 17% of kits were distributed via the community and workplace models, respectively. Clients reached via the workplace model were less likely to opt for onsite testing than clients in the community model (8% vs 29%). 6% of onsite workplace testers tested reactive compared to 2% of onsite community testers. Best-case scenario estimated 17,458 (91%) clients self-tested, 633 (4%) received reactive-test results, 606 (96%) linked to confirmatory testing, and 505 (83%) initiated ART. Personnel and HIVST kits represented 60% and 32% of total costs, respectively. Average costs were: per kit distributed US$17.23, per client tested US$18.91, per client with a reactive test US$521.54, per client confirmed positive US$550.83, and per client initiating ART US$708.60. Lower rates for testing, reactivity, and linkage to care in the worst-case scenario resulted in higher average costs along the treatment cascade.<br />Conclusion: This study fills a significant evidence gap regarding costs of HIVST provision along the client care cascade in Eswatini. Workplace and community-based distribution of HIVST accompanied with effective linkage to care strategies can support countries to reach cascade objectives.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-2334
Volume :
22
Issue :
Suppl 1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC infectious diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38424538
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08694-y