Back to Search Start Over

Both HFpEF and HFmrEF should be included in calculating CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score: A Taiwanese longitudinal cohort.

Authors :
Cheng CC
Huang PS
Chen JJ
Chiu FC
Chang SN
Wang YC
Wu CK
Hwang JJ
Tsai CT
Source :
Heart rhythm [Heart Rhythm] 2024 Sep; Vol. 21 (9), pp. 1500-1506. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 27.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Congestive heart failure (CHF) as a risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) mainly referred to patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Whether this should include patients with preserved ejection fraction is debatable.<br />Objective: The study aimed to investigate the variation in stroke risk of AF patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) for enhancing risk assessment and subsequent management strategies.<br />Methods: In a longitudinal study using the National Taiwan University Hospital integrated Medical Database, 8358 patients with AF were observed for 10 years (mean follow-up, 3.76 years). The study evaluated the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with differing ejection fractions and CHA <subscript>2</subscript> DS <subscript>2</subscript> -VASc score, further using Cox models adjusted for risk factors of AF-related stroke.<br />Results: Patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF had a higher mean CHA <subscript>2</subscript> DS <subscript>2</subscript> -VASc score compared with patients with HFrEF (4.30 ± 1.729 vs 4.15 ± 1.736 vs 3.73 ± 1.712; P < .001) and higher risk of stroke during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40 [1.161-1.688; P < .001] for HFmrEF; HR, 1.184 [1.075-1.303; P = .001] for HFpEF vs no CHF) after multivariate adjustment). In patients with lower CHA <subscript>2</subscript> DS <subscript>2</subscript> -VASc score (0-4), presence of any type of CHF increased ischemic stroke risk (HFrEF HR, 1.568 [1.189-2.068; P = .001]; HFmrEF HR, 1.890 [1.372-2.603; P < .001]; HFpEF HR, 1.800 [1.526-2.123; P < .001] vs no CHF).<br />Conclusion: After multivariate adjustment, HFpEF and HFmrEF showed a similar risk of stroke in AF patients. Therefore, it is important to extend the criteria for C in the CHA <subscript>2</subscript> DS <subscript>2</subscript> -VASc score to include patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF. In patients with fewer concomitant stroke risk factors, the presence of any subtype of CHF increases risk for ischemic stroke.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1556-3871
Volume :
21
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Heart rhythm
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38423377
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.048