Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of Visual Function with Cotoretigene Toliparvovec in X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa in the Randomized XIRIUS Phase 2/3 Study.

Authors :
Lam BL
Pennesi ME
Kay CN
Panda S
Gow JA
Zhao G
MacLaren RE
Source :
Ophthalmology [Ophthalmology] 2024 Sep; Vol. 131 (9), pp. 1083-1093. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 28.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Cotoretigene toliparvovec (BIIB112/AAV8-RPGR) is an investigational vector-based gene therapy designed to provide a full-length, codon-optimized retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR) protein to individuals with RPGR-associated X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP). We assessed efficacy and tolerability of cotoretigene toliparvovec subretinal gene therapy.<br />Design: Part 2 of the XIRIUS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03116113) was a phase 2/3, 12-month, randomized (1:1:1) dose-expansion study.<br />Participants: Male patients ≥10 years of age with RPGR-associated XLRP were included.<br />Methods: Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to receive low-dose subretinal cotoretigene toliparvovec (5 × 10 <superscript>10</superscript> vector genomes/eye), high-dose cotoretigene toliparvovec (2.5 × 10 <superscript>11</superscript> vector genomes/eye) or to be an untreated control participant.<br />Main Outcome Measures: The primary end point was the percentage of participants meeting microperimetry responder criteria (≥ 7-dB improvement at ≥ 5 of 16 central loci). Secondary end points included change from baseline in retinal sensitivity at the central 16 loci and the entire 68 loci at 12 months and change from baseline in low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA) at 12 months, as well as the proportion of eyes with a ≥ 15-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study ETDRS letter LLVA and ≥ 10-ETDRS letter LLVA change from baseline at month 12.<br />Results: Because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, enrollment ended before reaching the initial target, leaving the trial underpowered. Twenty-nine participants were included (low-dose group, n = 10; high-dose group, n = 10; control group, n = 9). At month 12, the percentage of participants meeting microperimetry responder criteria was not significantly different between either cotoretigene toliparvovec group (low dose, 37.5% [P = 0.3181]; high dose, 25.0% [P = 0.5177]) and the control group (22.2%). However, the mean change from baseline in microperimetry sensitivity improved significantly with the low-dose group versus the control group at month 12 (P = 0.0350). Significant improvement in LLVA occurred in the low-dose group versus the control group at month 12 (33.3% difference [80% confidence interval, 14.7%-55.2%]; P = 0.0498). Three ocular-related serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in the low-dose group versus 7 SAEs in the high-dose group.<br />Conclusions: The primary microperimetry end point was not met. Significant improvements in LLVA and mean microperimetry were observed compared with controls and fewer SAEs occured with low-dose compared with high dose cotoretigene toliparvovec.<br />Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.<br /> (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1549-4713
Volume :
131
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Ophthalmology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38423215
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.02.023