Back to Search
Start Over
Management of acute and chronic pelvic sepsis after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer-a 10-year experience of a national referral centre.
- Source :
-
Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland [Colorectal Dis] 2024 Apr; Vol. 26 (4), pp. 650-659. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 28. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Aim: Uncontrolled pelvic sepsis following rectal cancer surgery may lead to dramatic consequences with significant impact on patients' quality of life. The aim of this retrospective observational study is to evaluate management of pelvic sepsis after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer at a national referral centre.<br />Method: Referred patients with acute or chronic pelvic sepsis after sphincter preserving rectal cancer resection, with the year of referral between 2010 and 2014 (A) or between 2015 and 2020 (B), were included. The main outcome was control of pelvic sepsis at the end of follow-up, with healed anastomosis with restored faecal stream (RFS) as co-primary outcome.<br />Results: In total 136 patients were included: 49 in group A and 87 in group B. After a median follow-up of 82 months (interquartile range 35-100) in group A and 42 months (interquartile range 22-60) in group B, control of pelvic sepsis was achieved in all patients who received endoscopic vacuum assisted surgical closure (7/7 and 2/2), in 91% (19/21) and 89% (31/35) of patients who received redo anastomosis (P = 1.000) and in 100% (18/18) and 95% (41/43) of patients who received intersphincteric resection (P = 1.000), respectively. Restorative procedures resulted in a healed anastomosis with RFS in 61% (17/28) of patients in group A and 68% (25/37) of patients in group B (P = 0.567).<br />Conclusion: High rates of success can be achieved with surgical salvage of pelvic sepsis in a dedicated tertiary referral centre, without significant differences over time. In well selected and motivated patients a healed anastomosis with RFS can be achieved in the majority.<br /> (© 2024 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Female
Retrospective Studies
Middle Aged
Aged
Postoperative Complications etiology
Postoperative Complications surgery
Postoperative Complications therapy
Chronic Disease
Acute Disease
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy methods
Anastomosis, Surgical adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Pelvic Infection etiology
Pelvic Infection surgery
Referral and Consultation statistics & numerical data
Reoperation statistics & numerical data
Reoperation methods
Rectal Neoplasms surgery
Sepsis etiology
Sepsis surgery
Proctectomy adverse effects
Proctectomy methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1463-1318
- Volume :
- 26
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38418896
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16863