Back to Search Start Over

Validation of the modified CT criteria for identifying non-adenomas.

Authors :
Kwak MH
Yun JS
Kim JN
Lee YR
Kim CK
Kang KA
Source :
Abdominal radiology (New York) [Abdom Radiol (NY)] 2024 May; Vol. 49 (5), pp. 1603-1614. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 27.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Although adrenal computed tomography (CT) percentage washout is a potentially powerful imaging technique for differentiating adrenal adenomas from non-adenomas, its application to non-adenomas can be problematic. Recently, modified criteria for diagnosing pheochromocytomas using adrenal CT were developed based on data from 199 patients with surgically proven pheochromocytomas and adenomas. However, these criteria have not been thoroughly validated. The purpose of this study was to validate the performance of the modified criteria for diagnosing non-adenomas including pheochromocytomas.<br />Methods: The conventional and modified criteria were applied to 266 patients from two cohorts who had surgically proven lipid-poor adenomas (155/266, 58.3%) and non-adenomas (111/266, 41.7%) and underwent adrenal CT. Two radiologists calculated the attenuation on each dynamic phase and percentage washout of adrenal masses. The final assessments based on the conventional and modified criteria were categorized into adenomas or non-adenomas. The diagnostic performance of each criterion for diagnosing non-adenomas was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). False negatives and positives were also compared.<br />Results: The AUC for the diagnosis of non-adenomas was 0.806 for conventional criteria and 0.858 for modified criteria (pā€‰=ā€‰0.047). The false-negative rate of conventional criteria for the diagnosis of non-adenomas was 29.7%. Use of modified criteria could have reduced the false-negative rate by to 7.2%. The false-positive rate increased from 9% to 21.3% when using the modified criteria.<br />Conclusion: The utilization of modified criteria has the potential to identify additional non-adenomas that would otherwise be misdiagnosed as adenomas using conventional criteria alone.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2366-0058
Volume :
49
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Abdominal radiology (New York)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38411694
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04206-x