Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical outcomes of patients referred for left atrial appendage exclusion who did and did not undergo the procedure.
- Source :
-
Heart rhythm [Heart Rhythm] 2024 Jul; Vol. 21 (7), pp. 1016-1023. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 23. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) is an effective alternative to long-term anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Not all patients considered for LAAE undergo the procedure because of ineligibility, anatomic or medical constraints, and preference of the patient.<br />Objective: The objective of this study was to report on the management strategies and long-term clinical outcomes of patients referred to a dedicated multidisciplinary LAAE clinic, including all who subsequently did and did not undergo LAAE.<br />Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data from all patients referred to the comprehensive multidisciplinary LAAE clinic at the University of Michigan between 2016 and 2022. A consecutive 301 patients (age, 75 ± 8 years; 106 women) with atrial fibrillation were evaluated. LAAE was performed in 168 patients (56%) with use of the Watchman device in 146 (49%) and surgically in 22 (7%). LAAE was not performed in 133 patients (44%, no-LAAE group) because of ineligibility in 62 (21%), anatomic constraints in 23 (7%), and preference of the patient in 48 (36%). The CHA <subscript>2</subscript> DS <subscript>2</subscript> -VASc score (4.7 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 1.6; P = .002) and HAS-BLED score (3.4 ± 1.0 vs 2.8 ± 1.1; P < .001) were higher in the LAAE groups.<br />Results: Anticoagulant therapy was discontinued in 137 of 146 (94%) and 61 of 133 (61%) in the Watchman and no-LAAE groups, respectively (P < .001). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 1.2-4.0 years), in the LAAE (n = 168) and no-LAAE (n = 133) groups, respectively, 39 (23%) vs 29 (22%) deaths, 13 (8%) vs 5 (4%) thromboembolic events, and 24 (14%) vs 23 (17%) bleeding complications occurred. Continued long-term anticoagulation was not a predictor of clinical outcomes.<br />Conclusion: After a comprehensive evaluation in a multidisciplinary clinic, ∼50% of the patients referred for LAAE did not proceed with LAAE and resumed anticoagulation.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Female
Male
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Cardiac Surgical Procedures methods
Follow-Up Studies
Stroke prevention & control
Stroke etiology
Stroke epidemiology
Anticoagulants therapeutic use
Atrial Appendage surgery
Atrial Fibrillation surgery
Atrial Fibrillation complications
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1556-3871
- Volume :
- 21
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Heart rhythm
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38403234
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.044