Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic utility of prolonged ambulatory video-electroencephalography monitoring.

Authors :
Li MC
Seneviratne UK
Nurse ES
Cook MJ
Halliday AJ
Source :
Epilepsy & behavior : E&B [Epilepsy Behav] 2024 Apr; Vol. 153, pp. 109652. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 23.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objectives: Ambulatory video-electroencephalography (video-EEG) represents a low-cost, convenient and accessible alternative to inpatient video-EEG monitoring, however few studies have examined their diagnostic yield. In this large-scale retrospective study conducted in Australia, we evaluated the efficacy of prolonged ambulatory video-EEG recordings in capturing diagnostic events and resolving the referring question.<br />Methods: Sequential adult and paediatric ambulatory video-EEG reports from April 2020 to June 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Data collection included patient demographics, clinical information, and details of events and EEG abnormalities. Clinical utility was assessed by examining i) time to first diagnostic event, and ii) ability to resolve the referring questions - seizure localisation, quantification, classification, and differentiation (differentiating seizures from non-epileptic events).<br />Results: Of the 600 reports analysed, 49 % captured at least one event, and 45 % captured interictal abnormalities (epileptiform or non-epileptiform). Seizures, probable psychogenic events (mostly non-convulsive), and other non-epileptic events occurred in 13 %, 23 % and 21 % of recordings respectively, with overlap. Unreported events were captured in 53 (9 %) recordings, and unreported seizures represented more than half of all seizures captured (51 %, 392/773). Nine percent of events were missing clinical, video or electrographic data. A diagnostic event occurred in 244 (41 %) recordings, of which 14 % were captured between the fifth and eighth day of recording. Reported event frequency ≥ 1/week was the only significant predictor of diagnostic event capture. In recordings with both seizures and psychogenic events, unrecognized seizures were frequent, and seizures may be missed if recording is terminated early. The referring question was resolved in 85 % of reports with at least one event, and 53 % of all reports. Specifically, this represented 46 % of reports (235/512) for differentiation of events, and 75 % of reports (27/36) for classification of seizures.<br />Conclusion: Ambulatory video-EEG recordings are of high diagnostic value in capturing clinically relevant events and resolving the referring clinical questions.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Michael Li reports administrative support was provided by Seer Medical Pty Ltd. Mark Cook & Ewan Nurse reports a relationship with Seer Medical Pty Ltd that includes: board membership. 1. Chief Medical Officer of Seer Medical - M.C. 2. Director of Epilepsy Research at Seer Medical - E.N. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1525-5069
Volume :
153
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Epilepsy & behavior : E&B
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38401413
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109652