Back to Search Start Over

Distinguishing Clinical From Statistical Significances in Contemporary Comparative Effectiveness Research.

Authors :
Gikandi A
Hallet J
Koerkamp BG
Clark CJ
Lillemoe KD
Narayan RR
Mamon HJ
Zenati MA
Wasif N
Safran DG
Besselink MG
Chang DC
Traeger LN
Weissman JS
Fong ZV
Source :
Annals of surgery [Ann Surg] 2024 Jun 01; Vol. 279 (6), pp. 907-912. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 23.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of clinical significance reporting in contemporary comparative effectiveness research (CER).<br />Background: In CER, a statistically significant difference between study groups may or may not be clinically significant. Misinterpreting statistically significant results could lead to inappropriate recommendations that increase health care costs and treatment toxicity.<br />Methods: CER studies from 2022 issues of the Annals of Surgery , Journal of the American Medical Association , Journal of Clinical Oncology , Journal of Surgical Research , and Journal of the American College of Surgeons were systematically reviewed by 2 different investigators. The primary outcome of interest was whether the authors specified what they considered to be a clinically significant difference in the "Methods."<br />Results: Of 307 reviewed studies, 162 were clinical trials and 145 were observational studies. Authors specified what they considered to be a clinically significant difference in 26 studies (8.5%). Clinical significance was defined using clinically validated standards in 25 studies and subjectively in 1 study. Seven studies (2.3%) recommended a change in clinical decision-making, all with primary outcomes achieving statistical significance. Five (71.4%) of these studies did not have clinical significance defined in their methods. In randomized controlled trials with statistically significant results, sample size was inversely correlated with effect size ( r = -0.30, P = 0.038).<br />Conclusions: In contemporary CER, most authors do not specify what they consider to be a clinically significant difference in study outcome. Most studies recommending a change in clinical decision-making did so based on statistical significance alone, and clinical significance was usually defined with clinically validated standards.<br />Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1528-1140
Volume :
279
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38390761
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006250