Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
- Source :
-
Frontiers in immunology [Front Immunol] 2024 Feb 08; Vol. 15, pp. 1255577. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 08 (Print Publication: 2024). - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show a significant overall survival advantage over standard advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) therapies, tumor response to these agents remains poor. Some studies have shown that combination therapy including an ICI appears to be the best treatment; however, the overall benefit in terms of efficacy and toxicity still needs to be assessed. Thus, we performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the differences in the efficacy of several combinations that include an ICI to provide a basis for clinical treatment selection.<br />Methods: We conducted a thorough search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for articles from January 2010 to June 2023. R 4.4.2 and STATA 16.0 were used to analyze data; hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the results.<br />Results: An indirect comparison showed that nivolumab plus cabozantinib and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib were the most effective treatments for progression-free survival (PFS), with no significant differences between the two interventions (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.96-1.78; P=0.08); rank probability showed that pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib had a 57.1% chance of being the preferred treatment. In the absence of indirect comparisons between pembrolizumab plus axitinib, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, avelumab plus axitinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib, and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, pembrolizumab plus axitinib (40.2%) was the best treatment option for overall survival (OS). Compared to pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.65; P=0.02) and pembrolizumab plus axitinib (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.00-0.78; P<0.001) had a lower incidence of overall adverse events (AEs).<br />Conclusion: Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib and pembrolizumab plus axitinib resulted in the highest PFS and OS rates, respectively. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib may be the best option when AEs are a concern.<br />Systematic Review Registration: https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY202410078.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Chen, Xu, Wu, Xie, Wang and Liu.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Network Meta-Analysis
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized administration & dosage
Phenylurea Compounds adverse effects
Phenylurea Compounds administration & dosage
Phenylurea Compounds therapeutic use
Quinolines therapeutic use
Quinolines adverse effects
Quinolines administration & dosage
Pyridines therapeutic use
Pyridines adverse effects
Pyridines administration & dosage
Nivolumab therapeutic use
Nivolumab adverse effects
Nivolumab administration & dosage
Anilides adverse effects
Anilides therapeutic use
Anilides administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome
Progression-Free Survival
Carcinoma, Renal Cell drug therapy
Carcinoma, Renal Cell mortality
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors adverse effects
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors therapeutic use
Kidney Neoplasms drug therapy
Kidney Neoplasms mortality
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1664-3224
- Volume :
- 15
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Frontiers in immunology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38390328
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1255577