Back to Search
Start Over
Very high-energy electron therapy as light-particle alternative to transmission proton FLASH therapy - An evaluation of dosimetric performances.
- Source :
-
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [Radiother Oncol] 2024 May; Vol. 194, pp. 110177. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 18. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Clinical translation of FLASH-radiotherapy (RT) to deep-seated tumours is still a technological challenge. One proposed solution consists of using ultra-high dose rate transmission proton (TP) beams of about 200-250 MeV to irradiate the tumour with the flat entrance of the proton depth-dose profile. This work evaluates the dosimetric performance of very high-energy electron (VHEE)-based RT (50-250 MeV) as a potential alternative to TP-based RT for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect.<br />Methods: Basic physics characteristics of VHEE and TP beams were compared utilizing Monte Carlo simulations in water. A VHEE-enabled research treatment planning system was used to evaluate the plan quality achievable with VHEE beams of different energies, compared to 250 MeV TP beams for a glioblastoma, an oesophagus, and a prostate cancer case.<br />Results: Like TP, VHEE above 100 MeV can treat targets with roughly flat (within ± 20 %) depth-dose distributions. The achievable dosimetric target conformity and adjacent organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing is consequently driven for both modalities by their lateral beam penumbrae. Electron beams of 400[500] MeV match the penumbra of 200[250] MeV TP beams and penumbra is increased for lower electron energies. For the investigated patient cases, VHEE plans with energies of 150 MeV and above achieved a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of 250 MeV TP plans. For the glioblastoma and the oesophagus case, although having a decreased conformity, even 100 MeV VHEE plans provided a similar target coverage and OAR sparing compared to TP.<br />Conclusions: VHEE-based FLASH-RT using sufficiently high beam energies may provide a lighter-particle alternative to TP-based FLASH-RT with comparable dosimetric plan quality.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Andreas Bratel, Eric Landström and Erik Engwall are employees of RaySearch Laboratories AB. The other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Esophageal Neoplasms radiotherapy
Glioblastoma radiotherapy
Radiotherapy, High-Energy methods
Organs at Risk radiation effects
Radiometry methods
Electrons therapeutic use
Monte Carlo Method
Proton Therapy methods
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods
Radiotherapy Dosage
Prostatic Neoplasms radiotherapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-0887
- Volume :
- 194
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38378075
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110177