Back to Search Start Over

A nationwide mobile phone survey for tobacco use in Tanzania: Sample quality and representativeness compared to a household survey.

Authors :
Al Kibria GM
Kagoro F
Pariyo G
Ali J
Hassan F
Kilambo JW
Petro I
Maniar V
Kaufman MR
Vecino-Ortiz A
Ahmed S
Masanja H
Gibson DG
Source :
Preventive medicine reports [Prev Med Rep] 2024 Jan 12; Vol. 38, pp. 102609. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 12 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

We investigated the feasibility of an interactive voice response (IVR) survey in Tanzania and compared its prevalence estimates for tobacco use to the estimates of the 'Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) 2018'. IVR participants were enrolled by random digit dialing. Quota sampling was employed to achieve the required sample sizes of age-sex strata: sex (male/female) and age (18-29-, 30-44-, 45-59-, and ≥60-year-olds). GATS was a nationally representative survey and used a multistage stratified cluster sampling design. The IVR sample's weights were generated using the inverse proportional weighting (IPW) method with a logit model and the standard age-sex distribution of Tanzania. The IVR and GATS had 2362 and 4555 participants, respectively. Compared to GATS, the unweighted IVR sample had a higher proportion of males (58.7 % vs. 43.2 %), educated people (secondary/above education: 43.3 % vs. 21.1 %), and urban residents (56.5 % vs. 40 %). The weighted prevalence (95 % confidence interval (CI)) of current smoking was 4.99 % (4.11-6.04), 5.22 % (4.36-6.24), and 7.36 % (6.51-8.31) among IVR (IPW), IVR (age-sex standard), and GATS samples, respectively; the weighted prevalence (95 % CI) of smokeless tobacco use was similar: 3.54 % (2.73-4.57), 3.58 % (2.80-4.56), and 2.43 % (1.98-2.98), respectively. Most differences in point estimates for tobacco indicators were small (<2%). Overall, the odds of tobacco smoking indicators were lower in IVR than in GATS; however, the odds of smokeless tobacco use were reversed. Although we found under-/over-estimation of the prevalence of tobacco use in IVR than GATS, the estimates were close. Further research is required to increase the representativeness of IVR.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (© 2024 The Authors.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2211-3355
Volume :
38
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Preventive medicine reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38375185
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102609