Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy of bevacizumab through an indwelling pleural catheter in non-small cell lung cancer patients with symptomatic malignant pleural effusion.
- Source :
-
BMC pulmonary medicine [BMC Pulm Med] 2024 Feb 16; Vol. 24 (1), pp. 89. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 16. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Several studies have indicated that intrapleural infusion of bevacizumab is an effective treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with malignant pleural effusion (MPE). However, the impact of bevacizumab administered through an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) on the prognosis of these patients is unknown.<br />Methods: Consecutive advanced NSCLC patients with symptomatic MPE receiving an IPC alone or bevacizumab through an IPC were identified in a tertiary hospital. The patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected.<br />Results: A total of 149 patients were included, and the median age was 60.3 years. Males and nonsmokers accounted for 48.3% and 65.8%, respectively. A total of 69.8% (104/149) of patients harbored actionable mutations, including 92 EGFR-activating mutations, 11 ALK fusions, and 1 ROS1 fusion. A total of 81.9% (122/149) of patients received IPC alone, and 18.1% (27/149) received bevacizumab through an IPC. The incidence of spontaneous pleurodesis during the first 6 months was greater in the bevacizumab-treated group than in the IPC-treated group in the subgroup with actionable mutations (64.3% vs. 46.9%, P = 0.28). The median overall survival (OS) in patients with actionable mutations treated with bevacizumab through an IPC was 42.2 months, which was significantly longer than the 26.7 months in patients who received an IPC alone (P = 0.045). However, the median OS did not differ between the two arms in the subgroup without actionable mutations (10.8 vs. 41.0 months, P = 0.24). No significant difference between the bevacizumab through an IPC group and the IPC group was detected in the number of participants who had adverse events, either in patients with actionable mutations (14.3% vs. 8.4%; P = 0.42) or in patients without actionable mutations (16.7% vs. 12.8%; P = 1.00).<br />Conclusions: Bevacizumab through an IPC resulted in a significantly improved prognosis for NSCLC patients with MPE and actionable mutations. However, patients without actionable mutations do not benefit from bevacizumab through IPC.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Subjects :
- Male
Humans
Middle Aged
Bevacizumab therapeutic use
Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
Proto-Oncogene Proteins
Catheters, Indwelling adverse effects
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung complications
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung genetics
Pleural Effusion, Malignant etiology
Lung Neoplasms drug therapy
Lung Neoplasms genetics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1471-2466
- Volume :
- 24
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- BMC pulmonary medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38365707
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-02886-1