Back to Search
Start Over
Agreement between 30-day and 90-day modified Rankin Scale score and utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale score in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: An analysis of ATACH-2 trial data.
- Source :
-
Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia [J Clin Neurosci] 2024 Mar; Vol. 121, pp. 61-66. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 15. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- The relationship between 30- and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients was evaluated. This post hoc cohort analysis of the ATACH-2 trial included patients with acute ICH who were alive at 30 days and who had mRS scores reported at 30 and 90 days. The mRS score was then converted to a utility (EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Level [EQ-5D-3L])-weighted mRS score. After adjustment of 30-day mRS score for key covariates using multivariable ordinal regression, the relationship between 30-day and observed 90-day functional outcome was assessed via absolute difference in the utility-weighted version. Of the 1000 trial subjects, 898 met inclusion criteria. This low-moderate severity ICH cohort had a median baseline GCS score of 15 and median hematoma volume of 9.7 mL. Observed 30-day mRS had the largest association with observed 90-day values (χ <superscript>2</superscript>  = 302.9, p < 0.0001). Patients generally either maintained the same mRS scores between 30 and 90 days (48 %) or experienced a 1-point (32 %) or 2-point (10 %) improvement by 90 days. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) EQ-5D-3L at 90 days was 0.67 ± 0.26. Following adjustment, the mean absolute difference between predicted and observed utility-weighted 90-day mRS scores was 0.006 ± 0.13 points and less than the estimated minimal clinically important difference of 0.13 points. The difference in average utility-weighted mRS scores at 30 and 90 days was not clinically relevant, suggesting 30-day score may be a reasonable proxy for 90-day values in patients with ICH when 90-day values are not available.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: CIC received research funding from Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Bayer AG, Global Blood Therapeutics, and Janssen; received consulting fees from Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, and Global Blood Therapeutics; and received honoraria from Medscape. MC received consulting fees from Alexion and AstraZeneca Rare Disease; and received consulting fees from and served on the speakers’ bureau for Portola Pharmaceuticals. WLB has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca Rare Disease and Bayer AG. BK, BL, and MJC are employees of Alexion and AstraZeneca Rare Disease. ATC received research funding, consulting fees, and honoraria from Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Bayer AG, and Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-2653
- Volume :
- 121
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38364727
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2024.02.009