Back to Search Start Over

Automated echocardiographic left ventricular dimension assessment in dogs using artificial intelligence: Development and validation.

Authors :
Stowell CC
Kallassy V
Lane B
Abbott J
Borgeat K
Connolly D
Domenech O
Dukes-McEwan J
Ferasin L
Del Palacio JF
Linney C
Matos JN
Spalla I
Summerfield N
Vezzosi T
Howard JP
Shun-Shin MJ
Francis DP
Fuentes VL
Source :
Journal of veterinary internal medicine [J Vet Intern Med] 2024 Mar-Apr; Vol. 38 (2), pp. 922-930. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 16.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) could improve accuracy and reproducibility of echocardiographic measurements in dogs.<br />Hypothesis: A neural network can be trained to measure echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) linear dimensions in dogs.<br />Animals: Training dataset: 1398 frames from 461 canine echocardiograms from a single specialist center.<br />Validation: 50 additional echocardiograms from the same center.<br />Methods: Training dataset: a right parasternal 4-chamber long axis frame from each study, labeled by 1 of 18 echocardiographers, marking anterior and posterior points of the septum and free wall.<br />Validation Dataset: End-diastolic and end-systolic frames from 50 studies, annotated twice (blindly) by 13 experts, producing 26 measurements of each site from each frame. The neural network also made these measurements. We quantified its accuracy as the deviation from the expert consensus, using the individual-expert deviation from consensus as context for acceptable variation. The deviation of the AI measurement away from the expert consensus was assessed on each individual frame and compared with the root-mean-square-variation of the individual expert opinions away from that consensus.<br />Results: For the septum in end-diastole, individual expert opinions deviated by 0.12 cm from the consensus, while the AI deviated by 0.11 cm (P = .61). For LVD, the corresponding values were 0.20 cm for experts and 0.13 cm for AI (P = .65); for the free wall, experts 0.20 cm, AI 0.13 cm (P < .01). In end-systole, there were no differences between individual expert and AI performances.<br />Conclusions and Clinical Importance: An artificial intelligence network can be trained to adequately measure linear LV dimensions, with performance indistinguishable from that of experts.<br /> (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1939-1676
Volume :
38
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of veterinary internal medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38362960
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17012