Back to Search Start Over

Toward Individual Treatment in Cervical Artery Dissection: Subgroup Analysis of the TREAT-CAD Randomized Trial.

Authors :
Kaufmann JE
Gensicke H
Schaedelin S
Luft AR
Goeggel-Simonetti B
Fischer U
Michel P
Strambo D
Kägi G
Vehoff J
Nedeltchev K
Kahles T
Kellert L
Rosenbaum S
von Rennenberg R
Riegler C
Seiffge D
Sarikaya H
Zietz A
Wischmann J
Polymeris AA
Hänsel M
Globas C
Bonati LH
Brehm A
De Marchis GM
Peters N
Nolte CH
Christensen H
Wegener S
Psychogios MN
Arnold M
Lyrer P
Traenka C
Engelter ST
Source :
Annals of neurology [Ann Neurol] 2024 May; Vol. 95 (5), pp. 886-897. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 16.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: Uncertainty remains regarding antithrombotic treatment in cervical artery dissection. This analysis aimed to explore whether certain patient profiles influence the effects of different types of antithrombotic treatment.<br />Methods: This was a post hoc exploratory analysis based on the per-protocol dataset from TREAT-CAD (NCT02046460), a randomized controlled trial comparing aspirin to anticoagulation in patients with cervical artery dissection. We explored the potential effects of distinct patient profiles on outcomes in participants treated with either aspirin or anticoagulation. Profiles included (1) presenting with ischemia (no/yes), (2) occlusion of the dissected artery (no/yes), (3) early versus delayed treatment start (</>median), and (4) intracranial extension of the dissection (no/yes). Outcomes included clinical (stroke, major hemorrhage, death) and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes (new ischemic or hemorrhagic brain lesions) and were assessed for each subgroup in separate logistic models without adjustment for multiple testing.<br />Results: All 173 (100%) per-protocol participants were eligible for the analyses. Participants without occlusion had decreased odds of events when treated with anticoagulation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.07-0.86). This effect was more pronounced in participants presenting with cerebral ischemia (n = 118; OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.04-0.55). In the latter, those with early treatment (OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.07-0.85) or without intracranial extension of the dissection (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.11-0.97) had decreased odds of events when treated with anticoagulation.<br />Interpretation: Anticoagulation might be preferable in patients with cervical artery dissection presenting with ischemia and no occlusion or no intracranial extension of the dissection. These findings need confirmation. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:886-897.<br /> (© 2024 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1531-8249
Volume :
95
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38362818
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.26886