Back to Search Start Over

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium: impact of ending screening and isolation in a Danish University hospital.

Authors :
Hansen SGK
Klein K
Nymark A
Andersen L
Gradel KO
Lis-Toender J
Oestergaard C
Chen M
Datcu R
Skov MN
Holm A
Rosenvinge FS
Source :
The Journal of hospital infection [J Hosp Infect] 2024 Apr; Vol. 146, pp. 82-92. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 13.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Substantial resources are used in hospitals worldwide to counteract the ever-increasing incidence of vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-variable Enterococcus faecium (VREfm and VVEfm), but it is important to balance patient safety, infection prevention, and hospital costs.<br />Aim: To investigate the impact of ending VREfm/VVEfm screening and isolation at Odense University Hospital (OUH), Denmark, on patient and clinical characteristics, risk of bacteraemia, and mortality of VREfm/VVEfm disease at OUH. The burden of VREfm/VVEfm bacteraemia at OUH and the three collaborative hospitals in the Region of Southern Denmark (RSD) was also investigated.<br />Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including first-time VREfm/VVEfm clinical isolates (index isolates) detected at OUH and collaborative hospitals in the period 2015-2022. The intervention period with screening and isolation was from 2015 to 2021, and the post-intervention period was 2022. Information about clinical isolates was retrieved from microbiological databases. Patient data were obtained from hospital records.<br />Findings: At OUH, 436 patients were included in the study, with 285 in the intervention period and 151 in the post-intervention period. Ending screening and isolation was followed by an increased number of index isolates. Besides a change in van genes, only minor non-significant changes were detected in all the other investigated parameters. Mortality within 30 days did not reflect the VREfm/VVEfm-attributable deaths, and in only four cases was VREfm/VVEfm infection the likely cause of death.<br />Conclusion: Despite an increasing number of index isolates, nothing in the short follow-up period supported a reintroduction of screening and isolation.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-2939
Volume :
146
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of hospital infection
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38360093
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.01.019