Back to Search Start Over

International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023.

Authors :
Liu R
Abu Hilal M
Besselink MG
Hackert T
Palanivelu C
Zhao Y
He J
Boggi U
Jang JY
Panaro F
Goh BKP
Efanov M
Nagakawa Y
Kim HJ
Yin X
Zhao Z
Shyr YM
Iyer S
Kakiashvili E
Han HS
Lee JH
Croner R
Wang SE
Marino MV
Prasad A
Wang W
He S
Yang K
Liu Q
Wang Z
Li M
Xu S
Wei K
Deng Z
Jia Y
van Ramshorst TME
Source :
Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition [Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr] 2024 Feb 01; Vol. 13 (1), pp. 89-104. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 18.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: With the rapid development of robotic surgery, especially for the abdominal surgery, robotic pancreatic surgery (RPS) has been applied increasingly around the world. However, evidence-based guidelines regarding its application, safety, and efficacy are still lacking. To harvest robust evidence and comprehensive clinical practice, this study aims to develop international guidelines on the use of RPS.<br />Methods: World Health Organization (WHO) Handbook for Guideline Development, GRADE Grid method, Delphi vote, and the AGREE-II instrument were used to establish the Guideline Steering Group, Guideline Development Group, and Guideline Secretary Group, formulate 19 clinical questions, develop the recommendations, and draft the guidelines. Three online meetings were held on 04/12/2020, 30/11/2021, and 25/01/2022 to vote on the recommendations and get advice and suggestions from all involved experts. All the experts focusing on minimally invasive surgery from America, Europe and Oceania made great contributions to this consensus guideline.<br />Results: After a systematic literature review 176 studies were included, 19 questions were addressed and 14 recommendations were developed through the expert assessment and comprehensive judgment of the quality and credibility of the evidence.<br />Conclusions: The international RPS guidelines can guide current practice for surgeons, patients, medical societies, hospital administrators, and related social communities. Further randomized trials are required to determine the added value of RPS as compared to open and laparoscopic surgery.<br />Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://hbsn.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/hbsn-23-132/coif). M.A.H., F.P. and H.S.H. serve as unpaid editorial board members of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. M.G.B. acknowledges grants support to his hospital for the investigator-initiated DIPLOMA-2 randomized trial. B.K.P.G. reports grant from Intuitive Foundation and consulting fees from Transmedic, Local distributor of the Da Vinci robot. U.B. is proctor for Intuitive Surgical (pancreas surgery). The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.<br /> (2024 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2304-3881
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38322212
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-23-132