Back to Search
Start Over
How to obtain the image-derived blood concentration from 89 Zr-immuno-PET scans.
- Source :
-
EJNMMI physics [EJNMMI Phys] 2024 Feb 07; Vol. 11 (1), pp. 16. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 07. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: PET scans using zirconium-89 labelled monoclonal antibodies ( <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-mAbs), known as <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-immuno-PET, are made to measure uptake in tumour and organ tissue. Uptake is related to the supply of <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-mAbs in the blood. Measuring activity concentrations in blood, however, requires invasive blood sampling. This study aims to identify the best delineation strategy to obtain the image-derived blood concentration (IDBC) from <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-immuno-PET scans.<br />Methods: PET imaging and blood sampling of two <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-mAbs were included, <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-cetuximab and <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-durvalumab. For seven patients receiving <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-cetuximab, PET scans on 1-2 h, 2 and 6 days post-injection (p.i.) were analysed. Five patients received three injections of <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-durvalumab. The scanning protocol for the first two injections consisted of PET scanning on 2, 5 and 7 days p.i. and for the third injection only on 7 days p.i. Blood samples were drawn with every PET scan and the sample-derived blood concentration (SDBC) was used as gold standard for the IDBC. According to an in-house developed standard operating procedure, the aortic arch, ascending aorta, descending aorta and left ventricle were delineated. Bland-Altman analyses were performed to assess the bias (mean difference) and variability (1.96 times the standard deviation of the differences) between IDBC and SDBC.<br />Results: Overall, the activity concentration obtained from the IDBC was lower than from the SDBC. When comparing IDBC with SDBC, variability was smallest for the ascending aorta (20.3% and 17.0% for <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-cetuximab and <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-durvalumab, respectively). Variability for the other regions ranged between 17.9 and 30.8%. Bias for the ascending aorta was - 10.9% and - 11.4% for <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-cetuximab and <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-durvalumab, respectively.<br />Conclusions: Image-derived blood concentrations should be obtained from delineating the ascending aorta in <superscript>89</superscript> Zr-immuno-PET scans, as this results in the lowest variability with respect to sample-derived blood concentrations.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2197-7364
- Volume :
- 11
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- EJNMMI physics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38321232
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00621-7