Back to Search Start Over

Apixaban versus Aspirin for Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

Authors :
Geisler T
Keller T
Martus P
Poli K
Serna-Higuita LM
Schreieck J
Gawaz M
Tünnerhoff J
Bombach P
Nägele T
Klose U
Aidery P
Groga-Bada P
Kraft A
Hoffmann F
Hobohm C
Naupold K
Niehaus L
Wolf M
Bäzner H
Liman J
Wachter R
Kimmig H
Jung W
Huber R
Feurer R
Lindner A
Althaus K
Bode FJ
Petzold GC
Nguyen TN
Mac Grory B
Schrag M
Purrucker JC
Zuern CS
Ziemann U
Poli S
Source :
NEJM evidence [NEJM Evid] 2024 Jan; Vol. 3 (1), pp. EVIDoa2300235. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 22.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban and dabigatran were not superior to aspirin in trials of patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). It is unknown whether apixaban is superior to aspirin in patients with ESUS and known risk factors for cardioembolism. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-outcome trial of apixaban (5 mg twice daily) compared with aspirin (100 mg once daily) initiated within 28 days after ESUS in patients with at least one predictive factor for atrial fibrillation or a patent foramen ovale. Cardiac monitoring was mandatory, and aspirin treatment was switched to apixaban in case of atrial fibrillation detection. The primary outcome was any new ischemic lesion on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients were randomly assigned to receive apixaban (178 patients) or aspirin (174 patients) at a median of 8 days after ESUS. At 12-month follow-up, MRI follow-up was available in 325 participants (92.3%). New ischemic lesions occurred in 23 of 169 (13.6%) participants in the apixaban group and in 25 of 156 (16.0%) participants in the aspirin group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.42 to 1.48; P=0.57). Major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in five and seven participants, respectively (1-year cumulative incidences, 2.9 and 4.2; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 2.16). Serious adverse event rates were 43.9 per 100 person-years in those given apixaban and 45.7 per 100 person-years in those given aspirin. The Apixaban for the Treatment of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source trial was terminated after a prespecified interim analysis as a result of futility. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban treatment was not superior to cardiac monitoring-guided aspirin in preventing new ischemic lesions in an enriched ESUS population. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Medtronic Europe; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02427126.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2766-5526
Volume :
3
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
NEJM evidence
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38320511
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2300235