Back to Search Start Over

Anticoagulation Strategies in Non-Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19.

Authors :
McQuilten ZK
Venkatesh B
Jha V
Roberts J
Morpeth SC
Totterdell JA
McPhee GM
Abraham J
Bam N
Bandara M
Bangi AK
Barina LA
Basnet BK
Bhally H
Bhusal KR
Bogati U
Bowen AC
Burke AJ
Christopher DJ
Chunilal SD
Cochrane B
Curnow JL
Das SK
Dhungana A
Di Tanna GL
Dotel R
DSouza H
Dummer J
Dutta S
Foo H
Gilbey TL
Giles ML
Goli K
Gordon A
Gyanwali P
Haksar D
Hudson BJ
Jani MK
Jevaji PR
Jhawar S
Jindal A
John MJ
John M
John FB
John O
Jones M
Joshi RD
Kamath P
Kang G
Karki AR
Karmalkar AM
Kaur B
Koganti KC
Koshy JM
Krishnamurthy MS
Lau JS
Lewin SR
Lim LL
Marschner IC
Marsh JA
Maze MJ
McGree JM
McMahon JH
Medcalf RL
Merriman EG
Misal AP
Mora JM
Mudaliar VK
Nguyen V
O'Sullivan MV
Pant S
Pant P
Paterson DL
Price DJ
Rees MA
Robinson JO
Rogers BA
Samuel S
Sasadeusz J
Sharma D
Sharma PK
Shrestha R
Shrestha SK
Shrestha P
Shukla U
Shum O
Sommerville C
Spelman T
Sullivan RP
Thatavarthi U
Tran HA
Trask N
Whitehead CL
Mahar RK
Hammond NE
McFadyen JD
Snelling TL
Davis JS
Denholm JT
Tong SYC
Source :
NEJM evidence [NEJM Evid] 2023 Feb; Vol. 2 (2), pp. EVIDoa2200293. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Dec 10.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is uncertain. METHODS: In an open-label, adaptive platform trial, we randomly assigned hospitalized adults with Covid-19 to low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis or intermediate-dose or low-dose plus aspirin. In response to external evidence, the aspirin intervention was discontinued and a therapeutic-dose arm added. The primary end point was death or the requirement for new organ support by day 28, analyzed with a Bayesian logistic model. Enrolment was closed as a result of operational constraints. RESULTS: Between February 2021 and March 2022, 1574 patients were randomly assigned. Among 1526 participants included in the analysis (India, n=1273; Australia and New Zealand, n=138; and Nepal, n=115), the primary outcome occurred in 35 (5.9%) of 596 in low-dose, 25 (4.2%) of 601 in intermediate-dose, 20 (7.2%) of 279 in low-dose plus aspirin, and 7 (14%) of 50 in therapeutic-dose anticoagulation. Compared with low-dose thromboprophylaxis, the median adjusted odds ratio for the primary outcome for intermediate-dose was 0.74 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.43 to 1.27; posterior probability of effectiveness [adjusted odds ratio<1; Pr], 86%), for low-dose plus aspirin 0.88 (95% CrI, 0.47 to 1.64; Pr, 65%), and for therapeutic-dose anticoagulation 2.22 (95% CrI, 0.77 to 6.20; Pr, 7%). Overall thrombotic and bleeding rates were 0.8% and 0.4%, respectively. There were 10 serious adverse reactions related to anticoagulation strategy, of which nine were grade 1 or 2 across study interventions and one grade 4 episode of retroperitoneal hematoma in a patient receiving intermediate-dose anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized non–critically ill adults with Covid-19, compared with low-dose, there was an 86% posterior probability that intermediate-dose, 65% posterior probability that low-dose plus aspirin, and a 7% posterior probability that therapeutic-dose anticoagulation reduced the odds of death or requirement for organ support. No treatment strategy met prespecified stopping criteria before trial closure, precluding definitive conclusions. (Funded by Australian National Health and Medical Research Council or Medical Research Future Fund Investigator and Practitioner Grants and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04483960.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2766-5526
Volume :
2
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
NEJM evidence
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38320033
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2200293