Back to Search
Start Over
Wide-field imaging with smartphone based fundus camera: grading of severity of diabetic retinopathy and locating peripheral lesions in diabetic retinopathy.
- Source :
-
Eye (London, England) [Eye (Lond)] 2024 Jun; Vol. 38 (8), pp. 1471-1476. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 31. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Aim: To assess the performance of smartphone based wide-field retinal imaging (WFI) versus ultra-wide-field imaging (UWFI) for assessment of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) as well as locating predominantly peripheral lesions (PPL) of DR.<br />Methods: Individuals with type 2 diabetes with varying grades of DR underwent nonmydriatic UWFI with Daytona Plus camera followed by mydriatic WFI with smartphone-based Vistaro camera at a tertiary care diabetes centre in South India in 2021-22. Grading of DR as well as identification of PPL (DR lesions beyond the posterior pole) in the retinal images of both cameras was performed by senior retina specialists. STDR was defined by the presence of severe non-proliferative DR, proliferative DR or diabetic macular oedema (DME). The sensitivity and specificity of smartphone based WFI for detection of PPL and STDR was assessed. Agreement between the graders for both cameras was compared.<br />Results: Retinal imaging was carried out in 318 eyes of 160 individuals (mean age 54.7 ± 9 years; mean duration of diabetes 16.6 ± 7.9 years). The sensitivity and specificity for detection of STDR by Vistaro camera was 92.7% (95% CI 80.1-98.5) and 96.6% (95% CI 91.5-99.1) respectively and 95.1% (95% CI 83.5-99.4) and 95.7% (95% CI 90.3-98.6) by Daytona Plus respectively. PPL were detected in 89 (27.9%) eyes by WFI by Vistaro camera and in 160 (50.3%) eyes by UWFI. However, this did not translate to any significant difference in the grading of STDR between the two imaging systems. In both devices, PPL were most common in supero-temporal quadrant (34%). The prevalence of PPL increased with increasing severity of DR with both cameras (p < 0.001). The kappa comparison between the 2 graders for varying grades of severity of DR was 0.802 (p < 0.001) for Vistaro and 0.753 (p < 0.001) for Daytona Plus camera.<br />Conclusion: Mydriatic smartphone-based widefield imaging has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting STDR and can be used to screen for peripheral retinal lesions beyond the posterior pole in individuals with diabetes.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Middle Aged
Female
Male
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 complications
Aged
Severity of Illness Index
Adult
India
Sensitivity and Specificity
Fundus Oculi
Fluorescein Angiography methods
Reproducibility of Results
Diabetic Retinopathy diagnosis
Diabetic Retinopathy diagnostic imaging
Smartphone
Photography instrumentation
Photography methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1476-5454
- Volume :
- 38
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Eye (London, England)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38297154
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-02928-2