Comparison of Outcomes of Facial Reanimation Between the Use of Cross-facial Nerve Graft and the Masseteric Nerve as the Donor Nerve for Reinnervation of Gracilis Muscle Flap Transfer.

Background: In patients with facial paralysis, the free functional gracilis muscle transfer is preferred for facial reanimation. The choice of an adequate motor nerve to innervate the transplanted gracilis muscle is one of the procedure's key components. We present a comparative study between cross-facial nerve graft (CFNG) and masseteric nerve as donor nerves for reinnervated gracilis flap transfer in patients with complete facial paralysis.
Materlals and Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on all patients with complete facial paralysis who had a free functional gracilis muscle transfer for facial reanimation between January 2014 and December 2021. Only those who received gracilis transfer reinnervated by either CFNG or masseteric nerve were included in this study. The smile excursion and lip angle were measured for evaluating the outcomes postoperatively.
Results: The inclusion criteria were met by a total of 21 free functional gracilis muscle transfers, of which 11 were innervated by CFNG and 10 by the masseteric nerve. Both surgical procedures resulted in a highly considerable smile excursion of the reanimated side and postoperative improvement of static or dynamic lip angle. Masseteric nerve coaptation led to greater smile excursion and more significant improvement of dynamic lip angle than CFNG.
Conclusions: For patients who have complete facial paralysis, face reanimation can be successfully accomplished by free gracilis transfer reinnervated by the CFNG or the masseteric nerve. In particular, the masseteric nerve is a reliable choice for dynamic smile reanimation.
Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2023 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)