Back to Search Start Over

Iliopsoas plane block does not improve pain after primary total hip arthroplasty in the presence of multimodal analgesia: a single institution randomized controlled trial.

Authors :
Kim JY
Lee JS
Kim JY
Yoon EJ
Lee W
Lee S
Kim DH
Source :
Regional anesthesia and pain medicine [Reg Anesth Pain Med] 2025 Mar 05; Vol. 50 (3), pp. 257-263. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Mar 05.
Publication Year :
2025

Abstract

Background: The clinical analgesic efficacy of iliopsoas plane block remains a subject of discussion. This study aimed to assess the analgesic efficacy of iliopsoas plane block under general anesthesia using multimodal analgesia.<br />Methods: Fifty-six adult patients who underwent elective primary hip arthroplasty were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either a single-shot iliopsoas plane block (10 mL 0.75% ropivacaine with 1:200 000 epinephrine) or a sham block (10 mL normal saline). All patients received general anesthesia, multimodal analgesia (preoperative buprenorphine patch, 5 µg/h), intraoperative intravenous dexamethasone (8 mg) and nefopam (20 mg), and round-the-clock acetaminophen and celecoxib. The primary outcome was the numeric rating scale pain score at rest 6 hour after surgery.<br />Results: Iliopsoas plane block did not have a notable advantage over the sham block in terms of pain relief at rest, as assessed by the numeric rating scale score, 6 hour after total hip arthroplasty (iliopsoas plane block: median, 4.0; IQR, 2.0-5.8; sham: median, 5.5; IQR, 2.3-6.8; median difference, -1.0; 95% CI -2.0 to 0.0; p≥0.999). Linear mixed model analysis showed no differences in pain scores, opioid consumption, quadriceps strength, or quality of recovery between the groups.<br />Conclusions: Iliopsoas plane block did not improve postoperative analgesia following total hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia with a multimodal analgesic regimen. The blockade of sensory femoral branches supplying the anterior hip capsule using iliopsoas plane block may not yield additional benefits concerning patient outcomes in the aforementioned clinical context.<br />Trial Registration Number: NCT05212038, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05212038.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2025. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-8651
Volume :
50
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38286736
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-105092