Back to Search Start Over

Contemporary outcomes for arterial reconstruction with non-saphenous vein cryo-preserved conduits.

Authors :
Sanin GD
Negmadjanov U
Patterson JW
Hamid RN
Torosian T
Stafford JM
Sheehan MK
Goldman MP
Hurie J
Edwards MS
Velazquez G
Source :
Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2024 Jun; Vol. 79 (6), pp. 1457-1465. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 28.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: Cryopreserved (CP) products are utilized during challenging cases when autogenous or prosthetic conduit use is not feasible. Despite decades of experience with cadaveric greater saphenous vein (GSV), there is limited available data regarding the outcomes and patency of other CP products, specifically arterial and deep venous grafts. This study was designed to evaluate outcomes of non-GSV CP conduits in patients undergoing urgent, emergent, and elective arterial reconstruction at our institution. We hypothesized that non-GSV CP allografts have adequate patency and outcomes and are therefore a feasible alternative to GSV in settings where autologous graft is unavailable or prosthetic grafts are contraindicated.<br />Methods: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at our institution. We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients undergoing arterial reconstructions using CP conduits from 2010 to 2022. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, smoking status, indications for surgery, indication for CP conduit use, anatomic reconstruction, urgency of procedure, and blood loss. Time-to-event outcomes included primary and secondary graft patency rates, follow-up amputations, and mortality; other complications included follow-up infection/reinfection and 30-day complications, including return to the operating room and perioperative mortality. Time-to-event analyses were evaluated using product-limit survival estimates.<br />Results: Of 96 identified patients receiving CP conduits, 56 patients received non-GSV conduits for 66 arterial reconstructions. The most common type of non-GSV CP product used was femoral artery (31 patients), followed by aorto-iliac artery (22 patients), and femoral vein (19 patients), with some patients receiving more than one reconstruction or CP product. Patients were mostly male (75%), with a mean age of 63.1 years and a mean body mass index of 26.7 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> . Indications for CP conduit use included infection in 53 patients, hostile environment in 36 patients, contaminated field in 30 patients, tissue coverage concerns in 30 patients, inadequate conduit in nine patients, and patient preference in one patient. Notably, multiple patients had more than one indication. Most surgeries (95%) were performed in urgent or emergent settings. Supra-inguinal reconstructions were most common (53%), followed by extra-anatomic bypasses (47%). Thirty-day mortality occurred in 10 patients (19%). Fifteen patients (27%) required return to the operating room for indications related to the vascular reconstructions, with 10 (18%) cases being unplanned and five (9%) cases planned/staged. Overall survival at 6, 12, and 24 months was 80%, 68%, and 59%, respectively. Primary patency at 6, 12, and 24 months was 86%, 70%, and 62%, respectively. Amputation freedom at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months was 98%, 95%, and 86%, respectively for non-traumatic indications.<br />Conclusions: Non-GSV CP products may be used in complex arterial reconstructions when autogenous or prosthetic options are not feasible or available.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures None.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-6809
Volume :
79
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of vascular surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38286153
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.01.201