Back to Search Start Over

A Technique to Enable Efficient Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Automated Contouring of Prostate and Adjacent Organs.

Authors :
Hyer DE
Caster J
Smith B
St-Aubin J
Snyder J
Shepard A
Zhang H
Mullan S
Geoghegan T
George B
Byrne J
Smith M
Buatti JM
Sonka M
Source :
Advances in radiation oncology [Adv Radiat Oncol] 2023 Aug 07; Vol. 9 (1), pp. 101336. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 07 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to investigate the use of a segmentation approach that could potentially improve the speed and reproducibility of contouring during magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy.<br />Methods and Materials: The segmentation algorithm was based on a hybrid deep neural network and graph optimization approach that also allows rapid user intervention (Deep layered optimal graph image segmentation of multiple objects and surfaces [LOGISMOS] + just enough interaction [JEI]). A total of 115 magnetic resonance-data sets were used for training and quantitative assessment. Expert segmentations were used as the independent standard for the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, rectum, and femoral heads for all 115 data sets. In addition, 3 independent radiation oncologists contoured the prostate, seminal vesicles, and rectum for a subset of patients such that the interobserver variability could be quantified. Consensus contours were then generated from these independent contours using a simultaneous truth and performance level estimation approach, and the deviation of Deep LOGISMOS + JEI contours to the consensus contours was evaluated and compared with the interobserver variability.<br />Results: The absolute accuracy of Deep LOGISMOS + JEI generated contours was evaluated using median absolute surface-to-surface distance which ranged from a minimum of 0.20 mm for the bladder to a maximum of 0.93 mm for the prostate compared with the independent standard across all data sets. The median relative surface-to-surface distance was less than 0.17 mm for all organs, indicating that the Deep LOGISMOS + JEI algorithm did not exhibit a systematic under- or oversegmentation. Interobserver variability testing yielded a mean absolute surface-to-surface distance of 0.93, 1.04, and 0.81 mm for the prostate, seminal vesicles, and rectum, respectively. In comparison, the deviation of Deep LOGISMOS + JEI from consensus simultaneous truth and performance level estimation contours was 0.57, 0.64, and 0.55 mm for the same organs. On average, the Deep LOGISMOS algorithm took less than 26 seconds for contour segmentation.<br />Conclusions: Deep LOGISMOS + JEI segmentation efficiently generated clinically acceptable prostate and normal tissue contours, potentially limiting the need for time intensive manual contouring with each fraction.<br />Competing Interests: Daniel E. Hyer reports a relationship with Elekta that includes consulting or advisory, funding grants, and speaking and lecture fees. Joseph Caster reports a relationship with Elekta that includes funding grants. Joel St-Aubin reports a relationship with Elekta that includes funding grants and speaking and lecture fees. Jeffrey Snyder reports a relationship with Elekta that includes funding grants and speaking and lecture fees. Honghai Zhang reports financial support was provided by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. Sean Mullan reports financial support provided by National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. John Buatti reports a relationship with American Society for Radiation Oncology that includes board membership. Milan Sonka reports financial support from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2452-1094
Volume :
9
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Advances in radiation oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38260219
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101336