Back to Search
Start Over
Proximate and fatty acid compositions oft en wild-caught and farmed fish species in mato grosso state, brazil.
- Source :
-
Chemistry & biodiversity [Chem Biodivers] 2024 Feb; Vol. 21 (2), pp. e202301568. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 07. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- This study analyzed ten fish species (three farmed and seven wild-caught) to determine their centesimal composition (assessed by AOAC methods) and lipid profile (analyzed by GC-MS). Notably, "tambatinga" (farmed) and "piraputanga" (wild-caught) stood out with 28.66 % and 26.44 % protein content and 2.32 % and 3.71 % lipid content, respectively. Across all species, oleic acid was the predominant fatty acid, followed by linoleic acid. The sum of PUFAs ranged from 17.84 % in "matrinchã" to 7.85 % in "piraputanga". SFA varied from 49.93 % in "tambacu" to 39.90 % in "matrinchã", while MUFAs ranged from 44.34 % in "palmito" to 38.39 % in "tambaqui". "Matrinchã" had the highest average ω6 acid content (16.83 %), while "cachara" had the highest average for ω3 acids (5.73 %). "Piraputanga". "cachara", and "pincachara" exhibited the lowest ω6 levels. The analysis shows that fish have excellent nutritional values (proximate compositions) with few differences between species. "Pacu", "matrinchã", and "cachara" (wild-caught) demonstrated positive attributes, while "pincachara" (farmed) exhibited the highest nutritional quality in terms of fatty acid fraction. Based on quality indices (H/H), "pacu", "matrinchã" and "pincachara" are recommended choices for a healthy diet. This study adds valuable insights into the nutritional composition of fish species, which is essential for promoting regional development and local aquaculture.<br /> (© 2024 Wiley-VHCA AG, Zurich, Switzerland.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1612-1880
- Volume :
- 21
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Chemistry & biodiversity
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38252918
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202301568