Back to Search Start Over

Measures of empathy and compassion: A scoping review.

Authors :
Vieten C
Rubanovich CK
Khatib L
Sprengel M
Tanega C
Polizzi C
Vahidi P
Malaktaris A
Chu G
Lang AJ
Tai-Seale M
Eyler L
Bloss C
Source :
PloS one [PLoS One] 2024 Jan 19; Vol. 19 (1), pp. e0297099. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 19 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Evidence to date indicates that compassion and empathy are health-enhancing qualities. Research points to interventions and practices involving compassion and empathy being beneficial, as well as being salient outcomes of contemplative practices such as mindfulness. Advancing the science of compassion and empathy requires that we select measures best suited to evaluating effectiveness of training and answering research questions. The objective of this scoping review was to 1) determine what instruments are currently available for measuring empathy and compassion, 2) assess how and to what extent they have been validated, and 3) provide an online tool to assist researchers and program evaluators in selecting appropriate measures for their settings and populations. A scoping review and broad evidence map were employed to systematically search and present an overview of the large and diverse body of literature pertaining to measuring compassion and empathy. A search string yielded 19,446 articles, and screening resulted in 559 measure development or validation articles reporting on 503 measures focusing on or containing subscales designed to measure empathy and/or compassion. For each measure, we identified the type of measure, construct being measured, in what context or population it was validated, response set, sample items, and how many different types of psychometrics had been assessed for that measure. We provide tables summarizing these data, as well as an open-source online interactive data visualization allowing viewers to search for measures of empathy and compassion, review their basic qualities, and access original citations containing more detail. Finally, we provide a rubric to help readers determine which measure(s) might best fit their context.<br />Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.<br /> (Copyright: © 2024 Vieten et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Subjects

Subjects :
Psychometrics
Empathy
Mindfulness

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1932-6203
Volume :
19
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PloS one
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38241358
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297099