Effects of Simulation Fidelity on Health Care Providers on Team Training-A Systematic Review.

Abstract: This systematic review, following PRISMA standards, aimed to assess the effectiveness of higher versus lower fidelity simulation on health care providers engaged in team training. A comprehensive search from January 1, 2011 to January 24, 2023 identified 1390 studies of which 14 randomized (n = 1530) and 5 case controlled (n = 257) studies met the inclusion criteria. The certainty of evidence was very low due to a high risk of bias and inconsistency. Heterogeneity prevented any metaanalysis. Limited evidence showed benefit for confidence, technical skills, and nontechnical skills. No significant difference was found in knowledge outcomes and teamwork abilities between lower and higher fidelity simulation. Participants reported higher satisfaction but also higher stress with higher fidelity materials. Both higher and lower fidelity simulation can be beneficial for team training, with higher fidelity simulation preferred by participants if resources allow. Standardizing definitions and outcomes, as well as conducting robust cost-comparative analyses, are important for future research.
Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: This systematic review was part of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare guideline development process. A.L. is president of Resuscitation Council UK and a member of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Education, Implementation and Teams taskforce. A.D. is a member of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Education, Implementation and Teams task force. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2023 Society for Simulation in Healthcare.)